2011
DOI: 10.1115/1.4005187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux Evaluation in Primal and Dual Boundary-Coupled Problems

Abstract: A crucial aspect in boundary-coupled problems, such as fluid-structure interaction, pertains to the evaluation of fluxes. In boundary-coupled problems, the flux evaluation appears implicitly in the formulation and consequently, improper flux evaluation can lead to instability. Finite-element approximations of primal and dual problems corresponding to improper formulations can therefore be nonconvergent or display suboptimal convergence rates. In this paper, we consider the main aspects of flux evaluation in fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A naive evaluation of traction from the fluid Cauchy stress, − σ 1 n 1 , will converge poorly to the true traction, so we prefer to use variationally-consistent, conservative definitions of traction [68, 122]. In the case of Nitsche’s method, the appropriate discrete traction on surfaces with weakly enforced Dirichlet boundary conditions includes the penalty terms, matching the traction boundary condition of the FSI structural subproblem (11): th=σ1hn1ρ1true{true(u1hûhtrue)·n1true}true(u1hu2true)+τnormalTnormalAnormalNBtrue(true(u1hu2true)true(true(u1hu2true)·n1true)n1true)+τnormalNnormalOnormalRBtrue(u1hu2true)·n1true)n1, where {·} − denotes the negative part of the bracketed quantity, that is, {𝒜} − = 𝒜 if 𝒜 < 0 and {𝒜} − = 0 if 𝒜 ≥ 0.…”
Section: Nitsche’s Methods For Flow Around Immersed Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A naive evaluation of traction from the fluid Cauchy stress, − σ 1 n 1 , will converge poorly to the true traction, so we prefer to use variationally-consistent, conservative definitions of traction [68, 122]. In the case of Nitsche’s method, the appropriate discrete traction on surfaces with weakly enforced Dirichlet boundary conditions includes the penalty terms, matching the traction boundary condition of the FSI structural subproblem (11): th=σ1hn1ρ1true{true(u1hûhtrue)·n1true}true(u1hu2true)+τnormalTnormalAnormalNBtrue(true(u1hu2true)true(true(u1hu2true)·n1true)n1true)+τnormalNnormalOnormalRBtrue(u1hu2true)·n1true)n1, where {·} − denotes the negative part of the bracketed quantity, that is, {𝒜} − = 𝒜 if 𝒜 < 0 and {𝒜} − = 0 if 𝒜 ≥ 0.…”
Section: Nitsche’s Methods For Flow Around Immersed Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that a naive formulation of the 'slip' model leads to an ill-posed adjoint problem and adjoint inconsistency [14]. We provide numerical evidence that the corresponding adjoint solution exhibits spurious oscillations on a simple example dealing with a straight channel flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, their work did not consider adjoint techniques and did not use the 'slip' boundary coupling condition. On the other hand, van Brummelen et al [14] and Estep et al [15] have shown the importance of the treatment of boundary flux coupling for the use of adjoint-based techniques. To our best knowledge, no advances in the application of adjoint-based techniques to microfluidics applications, particularly those involving 'slip' boundary coupling, have yet been published in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 shows the drag coefficient C D for flow around a sphere at Re = 100, computed with our immersogeometric method using different B-rep models of the sphere, each with several levels of surface quadrature refinement. The drag force was evaluated using the variationally consistent conservative definition of traction (Bazilevs and Akkerman, 2010;van Brummelen et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2016). The triangulated surfaces cover mesh sizes from 0.08 to 0.005.…”
Section: Flow Around a Spherementioning
confidence: 99%