2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2009.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux decline along the flow channel in tubular ultrafiltration modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Figure 3c shows the effect of the flow (2.01, 5.31, and 7.38 L/min) on the J vs. ∆P T curves with the membrane with a 2 mm d h (temperature fixed at 60 • C and a concentration factor of 1.5). As expected, the increase in temperature and flow has a positive effect on the J L , but the concentration factor has a negative effect on this parameter [26,35]. Therefore, the J L can be modified by manipulating the hydrodynamic conditions, such as flow or CFV, and the system physico−chemical properties, i.e., concentration factor and temperature [13].…”
Section: Flux Versus ∆P T Curves: Effect Of the Processing Conditionssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Finally, Figure 3c shows the effect of the flow (2.01, 5.31, and 7.38 L/min) on the J vs. ∆P T curves with the membrane with a 2 mm d h (temperature fixed at 60 • C and a concentration factor of 1.5). As expected, the increase in temperature and flow has a positive effect on the J L , but the concentration factor has a negative effect on this parameter [26,35]. Therefore, the J L can be modified by manipulating the hydrodynamic conditions, such as flow or CFV, and the system physico−chemical properties, i.e., concentration factor and temperature [13].…”
Section: Flux Versus ∆P T Curves: Effect Of the Processing Conditionssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…As expected, when the cross-flow velocity was increased, an increase in the limiting flux was observed. 14,47 Another effect of this parameter on the curves can be observed: when the crossflow velocity is increased, the limiting transmembrane pressure increased significantly from 0.08 bar for 1.13 m/s to 1.05 bar for 4.29 m/s. That means that when a low cross-flow velocity is used for skim milk microfiltration, a low transmembrane pressure is needed to achieve a balance between the convection and erosion within the membrane−solution interface.…”
Section: Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that turbulent flow may consume the TMP of the system, causing a decline in the permeate flux. A recent study 60 showed that an optimal CFV depends on the frictional pressure drop, which is the function of solution viscosity and module configuration. In a normal flow channel a high tangential flow increases turbulence close to the membrane surface, which mitigates the formation of concentration−polarization.…”
Section: ■ Effects Of Process Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%