2010
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2010)073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux compactification on smooth, compact three-dimensional toric varieties

Abstract: Three-dimensional smooth, compact toric varieties (SCTV), when viewed as real six-dimensional manifolds, can admit G-structures rendering them suitable for internal manifolds in supersymmetric flux compactifications. We develop techniques which allow us to systematically construct G-structures on SCTV and read off their torsion classes. We illustrate our methods with explicit examples, one of which consists of an infinite class of toric CP 1 bundles. We give a self-contained review of the relevant concepts fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18]. For type II compactifications, example geometries have been constructed on twistor spaces [19][20][21], on more generic cosets [22], solvmanifolds [23] and on toric varieties [24][25][26]. While these geometries have led to interesting examples of string vacua, their construction is somewhat tedious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18]. For type II compactifications, example geometries have been constructed on twistor spaces [19][20][21], on more generic cosets [22], solvmanifolds [23] and on toric varieties [24][25][26]. While these geometries have led to interesting examples of string vacua, their construction is somewhat tedious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the problem of constructing SU (3) structures on SCTV is reduced to the problem of constructing one-forms K satisfying the requirements of [1]. Although that reference gave some examples of suitable one-forms, and many more were subsequently constructed in [2], no general formula for K exists satisfying the requirements of [1]. As a result, the search for SU (3) structures on SCTV had up to now proceeded on a case-by-case basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present paper we extend the formalism of [1] for SCTV to construct globally-defined SU (3) structures on the class CP 1 over M , where M is an arbitrary two-dimensional SCTV. As in [1], our construction is based on the existence of a one-form K which, in our case, is naturally distinguished by the structure of the bundle. This one-form does not have the right U (1) charge (in symplectic-quotient terminology) for the procedure of [1] to go through.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations