2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(20000510)48:1<111::aid-nme870>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flux and traction boundary elements without hypersingular or strongly singular integrals

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present paper deals with a boundary element formulation based on the traction elasticity boundary integral equation (potential derivative for Laplace's problem). The hypersingular and strongly singular integrals appearing in the formulation are analytically transformed to yield line and surface integrals which are at most weakly singular. Regularization and analytical transformation of the boundary integrals is done prior to any boundary discretization. The integration process does not require any c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve (M = 12) measurements are provided, three points on each side. Speciÿcally, the 'experimental' potential or ux is given at nodes 2, 5,8,11,13,15,19,20,23,27,29 and 31 (see Figure 3 for the discretization. )…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Twelve (M = 12) measurements are provided, three points on each side. Speciÿcally, the 'experimental' potential or ux is given at nodes 2, 5,8,11,13,15,19,20,23,27,29 and 31 (see Figure 3 for the discretization. )…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of equations is therefore greater than in the standard collocation scheme (which nevertheless can not be applied to this BIE), and greater than the number of unknowns, but can be easily reduced in order to arrive to a square system of equations (see Section 5), therefore, avoiding a costly least-squares solver. Gallego and Dominguez [24;25] employed this approach for fracture dynamic problems, Saez et al [28] for static fracture and Dominguez et al [29] extended it to 3D elastostatic fracture cases.…”
Section: Variation Boundary Integral Equation For the Potential Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this fact, a meaningful HBIE can be obtained once a regularization process based on the work of Domínguez et al [14] is performed.…”
Section: Conventional and Dual Bem For Three-dimensional Biot's Poroementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliabadi and co-workers [15,16] use discontinuous boundary elements with nodes already located at points where this condition is fulfilled. Another approach is that of Domínguez et al [14], where standard continuous boundary elements with multiple non-nodal collocation is used. The latter is considered in the present work since, as it will become clear in the next section, continuous boundary elements are much more appropriate for the proposed coupling.…”
Section: Conventional and Dual Bem For Three-dimensional Biot's Poroementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty for SGBEM is the existence of hypersingular integrals. Although numerous papers can be found in dealing with the hypersingular integrals [17][18][19], there are still some spaces that need more research works. The double boundary integration can increase the accuracy for SGBEM, but with a cost of computing time [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%