2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63529-7.00019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial to tidal transition zone facies in the McMurray Formation (Christina River, Alberta, Canada), with emphasis on the reflection of flow intensity in bottomset architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of ancient deposits, the fluvial to marine transition zone or similar terms have been used to describe stratigraphic changes from interpreted marine or tidal to fluvial deposits (Simpson et al ., ; Makhlouf, ; Eriksson et al ., ; Abouessa et al ., ). The term has rarely been applied to interpret down dip changes in time‐equivalent deposits that formed within a well‐defined zone with mixed fluvial and marine energy (van den Berg et al ., ; Martinius & Gowland, ; Martinius & Van den Berg, ; Martinius et al ., ) or to describe the interaction of fluvial and marine processes during deposition (Ghosh et al ., ; Dalrymple et al ., ; Gugliotta et al ., ; Jablonski & Dalrymple, ). Therefore, the understanding of interactions between several processes in the fluvial to marine transition zone and how these are preserved into the rock record is still poorly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of ancient deposits, the fluvial to marine transition zone or similar terms have been used to describe stratigraphic changes from interpreted marine or tidal to fluvial deposits (Simpson et al ., ; Makhlouf, ; Eriksson et al ., ; Abouessa et al ., ). The term has rarely been applied to interpret down dip changes in time‐equivalent deposits that formed within a well‐defined zone with mixed fluvial and marine energy (van den Berg et al ., ; Martinius & Gowland, ; Martinius & Van den Berg, ; Martinius et al ., ) or to describe the interaction of fluvial and marine processes during deposition (Ghosh et al ., ; Dalrymple et al ., ; Gugliotta et al ., ; Jablonski & Dalrymple, ). Therefore, the understanding of interactions between several processes in the fluvial to marine transition zone and how these are preserved into the rock record is still poorly constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2012; Feldman & Demko, 2015; Martinius et al. , 2015; Jablonski & Dalrymple, 2016), where the planform geometry, and hydraulic initial and boundary conditions, are not well‐constrained. Secondly, it implies that IHS is strongly related to tidal‐processes, and de‐emphasizes the potential importance of fluvial and wind‐wave processes (Smith et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2012; Feldman & Demko, 2015; Martinius et al. , 2015; Jablonski & Dalrymple, 2016), but fully‐fluvial McMurray Formation barform depositional models have also been proposed (cf. Moreton & Carter, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individual sets the volcaniclastic cross‐strata attain their highest dip angles near the unit base, with a gradual reduction in inclination upward through the unit until they more or less parallel the unit boundaries, suggesting an almost complete preservation of the original bedforms. However, the typical tripartite division of a nearly complete dune deposit consisting of a fine‐grained, ripple‐laminated bottomset followed by high‐angle foresets that pass upward through a distinct brinkpoint to a low‐angle stratified topset (Boersma, 1967; Martinius & Berg, 2011; Martinius et al ., 2015) is not found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%