2018
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2018-76
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial sediment pathways enlightened by OSL bleaching of river sediments and deltaic deposits

Abstract: Abstract. While a number of studies have investigated bleaching of the optical signals of sediments in rivers and deltas, unified trends and mechanisms for bleaching in these settings remain unresolved. Here, we explore the bleaching of the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signal of quartz sediments in a large fluviodeltaic system across time and space, by comparing residual doses of sand and silt from the modern Mississippi River channel with estimated residual doses of sand isolated from Late Holocene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The D e distributions for all 24 samples presented in combined radial and kernel density estimate plots are shown in Figures 5 and S2, S3 and S4, available online, which were generated by the R package ‘Luminescence’ of the abanico plot (Kreutzer et al, 2012). Two groups of ages reproduced by the CAM and MAM models are generally consistent within the experimental errors (Table 1 and Figure 6), indicating that most of the 45–63 μm quartz samples were well bleached in the area (Chamberlain et al, 2018b; Chamberlain and Wallinga, 2018; Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b). At least to some extent, some samples showed that the CAM D e values are higher than the MAM D e values, especially for relative young samples (<500 years) (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The D e distributions for all 24 samples presented in combined radial and kernel density estimate plots are shown in Figures 5 and S2, S3 and S4, available online, which were generated by the R package ‘Luminescence’ of the abanico plot (Kreutzer et al, 2012). Two groups of ages reproduced by the CAM and MAM models are generally consistent within the experimental errors (Table 1 and Figure 6), indicating that most of the 45–63 μm quartz samples were well bleached in the area (Chamberlain et al, 2018b; Chamberlain and Wallinga, 2018; Nian et al, 2018a, 2018b). At least to some extent, some samples showed that the CAM D e values are higher than the MAM D e values, especially for relative young samples (<500 years) (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This observation is puzzling, as finer grains should spend more time in suspension and consequently are exposed to light for a longer duration than are coarser grains (Gray & Mahan, ). However, differences in bleaching by grain size are not ubiquitous, as some researchers have found that finer grains have lower residual doses (Fuchs et al, ; Hu et al, ; Schielein & Lomax, ) and there are cases where all grain sizes seem adequately bleached (e.g., Chamberlain & Wallinga, )…”
Section: Luminescence and Its Characteristics In Geomorphic Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%