2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13111608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluvial Geomorphology and River Management

Abstract: This Special Issue deals with the role of fluvial geomorphology in landscape evolution and the impact of human activities on fluvial systems, which require river restoration and management [...]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And while individual land use characteristics were not particularly important in isolation, machine learning models consistently ranked this group as a whole to be as important as catchment area for predicting variability in flow at all timescales longer than a few months. We speculate that precipitation, temperature, and catchment size may regulate near-universal hydrological processes that are responsible for the highly compressible components of streamflow regime (those captured by the 7 PCA metrics) (Giano, 2021;N. LeRoy Poff et al, 1997), and that the more complicated ecohydrological interactions introduced by the myriad possible land use regimes and geological factors are responsible for streamflow properties that were harder to identify with PCA analysis (Bladon et al, 2014;Manning et al, 2022;Tague & Grant, 2004;Wu et al, 2021)-though we note that land use is likely correlated with climatic and geological factors.…”
Section: Streamflowmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…And while individual land use characteristics were not particularly important in isolation, machine learning models consistently ranked this group as a whole to be as important as catchment area for predicting variability in flow at all timescales longer than a few months. We speculate that precipitation, temperature, and catchment size may regulate near-universal hydrological processes that are responsible for the highly compressible components of streamflow regime (those captured by the 7 PCA metrics) (Giano, 2021;N. LeRoy Poff et al, 1997), and that the more complicated ecohydrological interactions introduced by the myriad possible land use regimes and geological factors are responsible for streamflow properties that were harder to identify with PCA analysis (Bladon et al, 2014;Manning et al, 2022;Tague & Grant, 2004;Wu et al, 2021)-though we note that land use is likely correlated with climatic and geological factors.…”
Section: Streamflowmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…And while individual land use characteristics were not particularly important in isolation, machine learning models consistently ranked this group to be as important as catchment area for predicting variability in flow at all timescales longer than a few months (Figure 10). We speculate that precipitation, temperature, and catchment size may regulate near‐universal hydrological processes that are responsible for the highly compressible components of streamflow regime (those captured by the seven PCA metrics; Giano, 2021; Poff et al., 1997), and that the more complicated ecohydrological interactions introduced by the myriad possible land use regimes and geological factors are responsible for the streamflow properties that were harder to identify with PCA analysis (Bladon et al., 2014; Manning et al., 2022; Tague & Grant, 2004; S. Wu et al., 2021), corroborating the need for a large number of non‐generalizable parameters that frequently occurs in modeling scenarios (Horton et al., 2022). Said differently, our results imply that a simple, emergent physics may exist at the catchment scale, where a handful of mean catchment properties accurately predict flashiness, timing, and volume of flow at the basin's outlet, to the extent that biological interactions remain simple (Sposito, 2017; Zhou et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the global importance of ecosystem services provided by river systems worldwide (Petsch et al, 2023), there is an urgent need to better understand the hydromorphological quality of rivers and their behavior in response to various natural and anthropogenic disturbances, especially in areas of the world where fluvial systems have been traditionally less investigated (Andreoli et al, 2012; Giano, 2021). River dynamics are highly non‐linear, making it very challenging to disentangle the relative role of several sources of impacts on their morphological response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%