2009
DOI: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray is more effective than fexofenadine for nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergy

Abstract: Nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis are an important cause of sleep disturbance. Reduction of nasal symptoms, particularly nasal obstruction, has been linked to improvements in self-reported sleep quality. The enhanced-affinity intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone furoate and the oral antihistamine fexofenadine were compared with respect to nighttime symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group studies, patients received fluticasone furoate nasal spray … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FFNS has also been investigated by Andrews et al, 2009, in two studies in comparison with placebo and the antihistamine fexofenadine 38,39 . In these studies, FFNS 110 mg once daily (combined n ¼ 992) was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to mean change from baseline to endpoint in night-time, daytime and 24-hour rTOSS (LS mean difference for all comparisons: 5À0.4, p50.007 and À0.4, p ¼ 0.034 for Study FFU109045 and FFU109047, respectively) and pre-dose iTOSS (LS mean difference: À0.5, p50.001 and À0.4, p ¼ 0.014 for Study FFU109045 and FFU109047, respectively) 38,39 .…”
Section: Fluticasone Furoatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFNS has also been investigated by Andrews et al, 2009, in two studies in comparison with placebo and the antihistamine fexofenadine 38,39 . In these studies, FFNS 110 mg once daily (combined n ¼ 992) was significantly more effective than placebo with respect to mean change from baseline to endpoint in night-time, daytime and 24-hour rTOSS (LS mean difference for all comparisons: 5À0.4, p50.007 and À0.4, p ¼ 0.034 for Study FFU109045 and FFU109047, respectively) and pre-dose iTOSS (LS mean difference: À0.5, p50.001 and À0.4, p ¼ 0.014 for Study FFU109045 and FFU109047, respectively) 38,39 .…”
Section: Fluticasone Furoatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 5 recent placebo-controlled studies, FF significantly improved iTOSSs. 30,31,[63][64][65] However, the absence of data for individual ocular symptoms in 4 of these studies has been cited as a weakness in their findings. 66 One study did show that FF significantly improved all individual morning symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The favorable effect of INSs on ocular symptoms [44] was supported by recent studies which included treatment with INSs agents: mometasone furoate (MF) [18,19,20,21], fluticasone furoate (FF) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28], fluticasone propionate (FP) [29,30], budesonide [31], and (to some degree) triamcinolone acetonide (TA) [32] and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray [33,34]. However, the effects of INSs on ocular symptoms were inconsistent across some separate studies [37,40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…FFNS provided consistent positive effects on the ocular symptoms of SAR, compared with placebo, across the 6 prospective trials [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,45]. These effects were consistent across different allergy seasons and geographic locations, and were considered to be robust owing to the consistent use of ocular symptom scores to determine ocular efficacy [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation