2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010832.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluphenazine (oral) versus atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Abstract: Measures of clinical response and mental state do not highlight differences between fluphenazine and amisulpride, risperidone, quetiapine or olanzapine. Largely measures of adverse effects are also unconvincing for substantive differences between fluphenazine and the newer drugs. All included trials carry a substantial risk of bias regarding reporting of adverse effects and this bias would have favoured the newer drugs. The four small short included studies do not provide much clear information about the relat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to psychosocial treatment and the examination discussed above, drug therapy was a large issue. New psychotropic agents, including second generation antipsychotics (SGA), newer antidepressants and newer mood stabilizers, have been much more expensive than the traditional agents, but the newer agents have not proven to be more effective than the traditional agents (Sampford, Sampson, & Li, 2016;Saha, Bo, & Zhao, 2016Bauer, Severus, & Möller, 2017). If a hospital used the more expensive newer drugs, it did not promise a better outcome but this would result in large increases in hospital spending.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to psychosocial treatment and the examination discussed above, drug therapy was a large issue. New psychotropic agents, including second generation antipsychotics (SGA), newer antidepressants and newer mood stabilizers, have been much more expensive than the traditional agents, but the newer agents have not proven to be more effective than the traditional agents (Sampford, Sampson, & Li, 2016;Saha, Bo, & Zhao, 2016Bauer, Severus, & Möller, 2017). If a hospital used the more expensive newer drugs, it did not promise a better outcome but this would result in large increases in hospital spending.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%