2008
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07091453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoxetine Versus Placebo in Preventing Relapse of Major Depression in Children and Adolescents

Abstract: Objective-The authors compared fluoxetine and placebo in continuation treatment to prevent relapse of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents.Method-After a detailed evaluation, children and adolescents 7-18 years of age with major depressive disorder were treated openly with fluoxetine. Those who had an adequate response after 12 weeks, as indicated by a Clinical Global Impression improvement score of 1 or 2 and a decrease of at least 50% in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised score, were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
103
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in our 12 week open trial of fluoxetine, residual symptoms were common even among remitters, with poor school performance, sleep disturbance, and mood being the most common residual symptoms (Tao et al 2010). Teens with more symptoms remaining at the end of 12 weeks of treatment are less likely to be remitted at 18 and 36 weeks , and are more likely to relapse (Emslie et al 2008). Thus, identifying factors that are associated with slower response will allow us to potentially target those specific areas to speed response and ultimately lead to higher remission rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Similarly, in our 12 week open trial of fluoxetine, residual symptoms were common even among remitters, with poor school performance, sleep disturbance, and mood being the most common residual symptoms (Tao et al 2010). Teens with more symptoms remaining at the end of 12 weeks of treatment are less likely to be remitted at 18 and 36 weeks , and are more likely to relapse (Emslie et al 2008). Thus, identifying factors that are associated with slower response will allow us to potentially target those specific areas to speed response and ultimately lead to higher remission rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We examined two relapse prevention clinical trials in which youth with major depressive disorder (MDD) were treated openly with fluoxetine for the first 12 weeks (Emslie et al 2008;Kennard et al 2008). In one trial, 168 youth (ages 8-17 years) were treated with fluoxetine 10-40 mg for 12 weeks, and responders were eligible to enter into a double-blind discontinuation phase (Emslie et al 2008).…”
Section: Evaluable Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one trial, 168 youth (ages 8-17 years) were treated with fluoxetine 10-40 mg for 12 weeks, and responders were eligible to enter into a double-blind discontinuation phase (Emslie et al 2008). In the other trial, 66 youth (ages 11-17 years) were treated with fluoxetine 10-40 mg for 12 weeks, and responders were randomized to either begin relapse prevention cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in addition to medication treatment, or to continue on fluoxetine alone (Kennard et al 2008). Patients in both studies were treated identically for the visits utilized in these analyses (first 12 weeks), and the data are reported by visit.…”
Section: Evaluable Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the majority of discontinuation trials, the primary outcome is the time to first relapse in the postacute phase. For example, Emslie et al (2008) used a discontinuation trial to answer the following question: ''Among depressed children and adolescents who acutely respond to 12 weeks of fluoxetine, what is the effect of immediately discontinuing medication versus discontinuation after an additional 12 weeks of treatment on time to first relapse? '' Assessing the impact of different treatment durations is often the explicit and primary rationale for discontinuation trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%