2007
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.143.5.637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopy-Induced Chronic Radiation Skin Injury

Abstract: Background: Fluoroscopy-induced chronic radiation dermatitis (FICRD) resulting from prolonged exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional procedures has been documented in the radiology and cardiology literature. However, the phenomenon has been rarely reported in the dermatologic literature. Since patients with FICRD often see a dermatologist or a primary care physician to treat their injuries, the diagnosis of FICRD is perhaps often overlooked.Observations: A 62-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
39
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Two types of biological damage may occur from radiation exposure. Deterministic effects include anatomic damage known to occur when radiation dose exceeds a specific amount, such as skin burns and hair loss on patients undergoing cardiac interventional procedures [5][6][7] and cataracts to the eye lens on interventional cardiologists; 8 recently, the cataracts threshold dose was reduced by 75%, 9 prompting efforts to reduce radiation doses to the eye. 10 Stochastic effects, including damage to the DNA which may cause long-term genetic defects and cancers, increase with radiation exposure; there is no specific threshold dose and risk is cumulative, so several decades may pass before manifestation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Two types of biological damage may occur from radiation exposure. Deterministic effects include anatomic damage known to occur when radiation dose exceeds a specific amount, such as skin burns and hair loss on patients undergoing cardiac interventional procedures [5][6][7] and cataracts to the eye lens on interventional cardiologists; 8 recently, the cataracts threshold dose was reduced by 75%, 9 prompting efforts to reduce radiation doses to the eye. 10 Stochastic effects, including damage to the DNA which may cause long-term genetic defects and cancers, increase with radiation exposure; there is no specific threshold dose and risk is cumulative, so several decades may pass before manifestation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common entrance sites of ionizing radiation associated with cardiac procedures are the scapula, back and lateral trunk under the axilla. Other common locations are the left flank (associated with mesenteric artery angiography and stent placement), the back (associated with TIPS) and the temporoparietal and occipital areas of the scalp (associated with neurovascular embolization) [1,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. For most patients, clinically significant skin and hair reactions are thought to occur when the skin dose is >5 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, severe skin injury with secondary ulceration has been reported in the literature to date in relation to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with or without stent placement, electrophysiology ablative procedures for cardiac arrhythmias, TIPS, mesenteric artery angiography with stent placement and renal artery catheterization and angioplasty [2,3,4,5,17]. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, no cases of skin necrosis with secondary ulceration related to endovascular intervention for cerebral aneurysms have yet been reported (table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Deterministic effects occur from radiation doses exceeding a threshold; these include skin burns and hair loss among patients (threshold absorbed dose of 2 Gy) [3][4][5][6] and cataracts to the eye lens of interventional cardiologists (occupational threshold dose of 20 mSv∕year). [7][8][9] Stochastic effects, with no specific threshold dose, 10 result from damaged DNA, causing long-term genetic defects and cancers; this is generally more of a concern for pediatric than adult patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%