2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroscopic and Magnetic Resonance Cross-Sectional Imaging Assessments of Radial and Ulnar Torsion Profiles in Volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, accuracy of preoperative planning is dependent on correct assessment of the angular and axial components of the deformity. Therefore, the lack of reliable assessments of radius and ulna axial malunions impair accurate planning of osteotomies of complex deformities in the radius and ulna [10,11]. The overall improvement in ROM after osteotomies for patients with a predominant deficit in supination was much better than for patients with a pronation deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, accuracy of preoperative planning is dependent on correct assessment of the angular and axial components of the deformity. Therefore, the lack of reliable assessments of radius and ulna axial malunions impair accurate planning of osteotomies of complex deformities in the radius and ulna [10,11]. The overall improvement in ROM after osteotomies for patients with a predominant deficit in supination was much better than for patients with a pronation deficit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone angulations are easily discernible on radiographs, but those involving the radius must be assessed with respect to a plane of reference taking into account the axial rotation of this bone during pronation-supination to make side comparison possible. Axial malunions are difficult to be estimated with two-plane radiographs, and therefore we recommend systematically assessing axial malunions preoperatively with MRI and fluoroscopy coupled with goniometry before planning corrective osteotomy of the forearm [10,11]. However, axial malunions of the radius and the ulna are difficult to quantify because the healthy side is the only available reference, and there are important side differences in the healthy population [4,10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anatomical landmarks, radiographs from the uninvolved opposite side and intraoperative image intensifier are used as a guide for planning, intraoperative orientation and control of the result [14,17,19,25]. However, the rotational component of a malunion is almost undetectable on plain radiographs [5][6][7]23] and requires a more sophisticated side-to-side comparison of bony rotation profiles on computed tomography (CT) images [2,6]. These methods assess rotational malunions based on few anatomical landmarks on 2-dimensional planes (2-d CT slices) in spite of the 3-d nature of the available data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%