Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004795.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis

Abstract: Only ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin have been tested in randomized controlled trials for treating tuberculosis. We cannot recommend ciprofloxacin in treating tuberculosis. Trials of newer fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis are needed. No difference has been demonstrated between sparfloxacin and ofloxacin in drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials as first-line agent for drug-sensitive TB resulted in higher relapse rates 10,11 Not recommended Levofloxacin 1.0 More efficacious than ofloxacin for second-line treatment, but ofloxacin resistance may lead to treatment failure 8,12 Recommended for inclusion in MDR-TB regimens Not currently recommended as first-line agent been reported to have a much higher co-resistance to other firstline and second-line agents used in the treatment of TB. 76 …”
Section: Cross-resistance To Newer Fq and Other Second-line Tb Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trials as first-line agent for drug-sensitive TB resulted in higher relapse rates 10,11 Not recommended Levofloxacin 1.0 More efficacious than ofloxacin for second-line treatment, but ofloxacin resistance may lead to treatment failure 8,12 Recommended for inclusion in MDR-TB regimens Not currently recommended as first-line agent been reported to have a much higher co-resistance to other firstline and second-line agents used in the treatment of TB. 76 …”
Section: Cross-resistance To Newer Fq and Other Second-line Tb Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, newer FQs such as moxifloxacin may be a reasonable alternative based on results from a single clinical trial [30]. Another later Cochrane meta-analysis was unable to establish the value of the newer FQs in the treatment of TB [31].…”
Section: Tuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their review, they also addressed FQ resistance, which increased in most instances over the years, particularly if the patients had been treated previously with FQs and if the report originated in Asia. In the abovementioned meta-analyses [29,31], the use of FQs as first-line drugs for the therapy of TB is discouraged as they are not superior to conventional therapy.…”
Section: Tuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously in the 1980s, FQs were discovered and proved useful not only for susceptible TB, but also for resistant strains [29,30]. Invariably, FQ discovery has thus far been the main achievement in MDR-TB treatment [31,32], but the irrational use of these drugs for other infections and among TB patients has aggravated the problem, thus promoting the emergence of XDR-TB.…”
Section: Mdr-tb As a Public Health Problem: The Impact Of Hivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, levofloxacin 1000 mg (double regular dosage) is showing similar efficacy to moxifloxacin with a reduction in total costs [78]. However, the actual role of the new FQs in the initial phase of treatment remains unclear [30,78]. It is necessary to address whether new-generation FQs, such as gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, could have similar sterilizing activity to RMP.…”
Section: Expert Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%