1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90101-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluoride profiles in different surfaces of human permanent molar enamels from a naturally fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…21 It should be noted that the surface enamel that is removed by bracket debonding contains the highest amount of fluoride. 22 Clinicians should be aware that although the amount of enamel loss may be small, permanent damage is introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 It should be noted that the surface enamel that is removed by bracket debonding contains the highest amount of fluoride. 22 Clinicians should be aware that although the amount of enamel loss may be small, permanent damage is introduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the buccal and lingual surfaces benefit from fluoride (F)-containing products, such as dentifrices and tablets, the effect on the approximal surfaces appears to be less pronounced [Granath et al, 1978;Li et al, 1994;Øgaard et al, 1994]. This suggests that targeted topical F application is essential to these less accessible areas of the dentition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that, apart from the antibacterial function of fluoride in drinking water, the absorption of fluoride into the enamel of adult teeth may also aid in the prevention of dental caries. The absorption of fluoride into adult tooth enamel is however dependant of the length of exposure of the teeth to the fluoride, the concentration of fluoride it is exposed to, the age of the individuals being studied as well as the different tooth surfaces under investigation (Tanaka et al, 1993;Li et al, 1994;Hirose et al, 1996). It has thus been shown that the difference in absorbed enamel fluoride when comparing groups exposed to water from a naturally fluoridated area and those from a non-fluoridated area is not significant and therefore its influence in the prevention of dental caries is negligible (Li et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%