2021
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202100370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent‐tagged Antiscalants: A New Look at the Scale Inhibition Mechanism and Antiscalant Selection

Abstract: Solid deposits onto equipment surfaces represent a serious problem all over the world. Mitigation of this process is provided by chemical inhibitors. However, irrespective of successful antiscalant application, the mechanisms of scale inhibition are still not very clear. Thus, the present review summarizes recent advances in novel fluorescent‐tagged antiscalants (polyacarboxylates, phosphonates) application for scale inhibition mechanisms study. Some paradoxical effects, detected during gypsum and barite scale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PAA-F1 covers the CaCO 3 surface completely and rather uniformly, while HEDP-F demonstrates a nonuniform location: some crystals of calcium carbonate appear to be completely uncovered, some are partly covered, while some are covered completely. The present study indicates, along with latest reports [27,31], that fluorescent-tagged scale inhibitors are capable to provide valuable information on the nature of scale inhibition.…”
Section: Sem and Fm Analysis Of Membrane Surfacesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…PAA-F1 covers the CaCO 3 surface completely and rather uniformly, while HEDP-F demonstrates a nonuniform location: some crystals of calcium carbonate appear to be completely uncovered, some are partly covered, while some are covered completely. The present study indicates, along with latest reports [27,31], that fluorescent-tagged scale inhibitors are capable to provide valuable information on the nature of scale inhibition.…”
Section: Sem and Fm Analysis Of Membrane Surfacesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In this way, antiscalant was evidently disabled as the [Ca-HEDP-F] species before the nucleation of gypsum had started, but it still provided retardation of deposit formation. The same effect was observed during gypsum deposition in an RO facility in the presence of PAA-F1 (see [ 33 ] and references there). Besides, in a static experiment at ambient temperature (supersaturation is achieved by mixing Na 2 SO 4 and CaCl 2 solutions), we have detected a similar result: classical stick-like crystals of gypsum mixed with spherical [Ca-HEDP-F] particles.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Recently the situation has changed due to the possibility to track AS directly in any water treatment process using fluorescent-tagged scale inhibitors [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Indeed, our recent experiments with gypsum scale formation in a laboratory RO setup in the presence of fluorescent-tagged bisphosphonate 1-hydroxy-7-(6-methoxy-1,3-dioxo-1Hbenzo[de]isoquinolin-2(3H)-yl)heptane-1,1-diyl-bis(phosphonic acid), HEDP-F (H 4 hedp-F) [ 32 ] and of fluorescent 1,8-naphthalimide-tagged polyacrylate (PAA-F1) [ 33 ] revealed a paradoxical effect: an antiscalant does not show any kind of interaction with gypsum, but provides nevertheless retardation of the corresponding deposit formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nanoimpurities' Role in Scale Formation/Inhibition More recently, a non-conventional inhibition mechanism in which scales are inhibited by heterogeneous formation on a "nanodust" particle surface, instead of ion pairs or clusters formed via homogeneous nucleation, was investigated [55]. Several fluorescent-tagged scale inhibitors were synthesized, which were able to provide visualization of the functionality of scale inhibitors during the formation of gypsum and some other scales [77][78][79].…”
Section: Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%