1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)92645-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent PET (photoinduced electron transfer) indicators for solvent polarity with quasi-step functional response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,16,43 PET is also more favorable in polar solvents. 44 Kinetic aspects can play a significant role, in particular, PET becomes less effective with increasing distance between fluorophore and the PET group and an adverse nature and orientation of molecular orbitals may inhibit the process. 4547 Nevertheless, these thermodynamic considerations generally enable a valuable estimation whether a PET process will take place and are suitable for identifying systems in which PET is impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,16,43 PET is also more favorable in polar solvents. 44 Kinetic aspects can play a significant role, in particular, PET becomes less effective with increasing distance between fluorophore and the PET group and an adverse nature and orientation of molecular orbitals may inhibit the process. 4547 Nevertheless, these thermodynamic considerations generally enable a valuable estimation whether a PET process will take place and are suitable for identifying systems in which PET is impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned here that the efficiency of a PET process can correlate with solvent polarity. For instance, for anthracence derivatives it was found to increase with polarity [ 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The generally lower polarity of the bead surface environment when compared to the mixed aqueous medium has no significant effect on PET rates in our case,56,64,7880 probably because of the rather exergonic PET process (as calculated for acetonitrile solution where Δ G PET = –0.3 eV). In other words, PET probably remains exergonic in the bead surface environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%