2003
DOI: 10.1002/seup.200390014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent Ion‐Sensing Microspheres for Multiplexed Chemical Analysis of Clinical and Biological Samples

Abstract: This review summarizes recent advances in the development of chemically selective microspheres with a view to developing new, attractive methodologies in clinical and biomedical analysis. In particular, the development of fluorescent ion-selective microspheres that function analogously to established bulk optodes is discussed. The fluorescent signal is dependent on a selective ion extraction process into a hydrophobic bulk phase doped with selective complexing agents. A mild preparation process for making larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion transport at medium/high analyte concentration and the convective mass transport at low concentration explain the response time. 3,4 Different strategies have been devised to reduce the response time of IBOS, with the most common ones including the ionophore chemistry in micro/nano sized spherical particles obtained by techniques such as heterogeneous polymerization, 7 sonic casting, 8 polymer swelling, 9 physical adsorption on the surface of microspheres 10 or O/W emulsion forming micelles. 11 The increase in the surface from the micro/nano particles and the reduction in the molecular diffusion distance enhance the mass transport and reduce the response time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diffusion transport at medium/high analyte concentration and the convective mass transport at low concentration explain the response time. 3,4 Different strategies have been devised to reduce the response time of IBOS, with the most common ones including the ionophore chemistry in micro/nano sized spherical particles obtained by techniques such as heterogeneous polymerization, 7 sonic casting, 8 polymer swelling, 9 physical adsorption on the surface of microspheres 10 or O/W emulsion forming micelles. 11 The increase in the surface from the micro/nano particles and the reduction in the molecular diffusion distance enhance the mass transport and reduce the response time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the drawbacks of planar film ionophore-based optical sensors (IBOS) working in equilibrium mode is the long response time, from minutes to hours depending on the analyte concentration, both in flow and disposable mode, due to the need to extract the target species from the solution to the bulk of the membrane. The diffusion transport at medium/high analyte concentration and the convective mass transport at low concentration explain the response time. , Different strategies have been devised to reduce the response time of IBOS, with the most common ones including the ionophore chemistry in micro/nanosized spherical particles obtained by techniques such as heterogeneous polymerization, sonic casting, polymer swelling, physical adsorption on the surface of microspheres, or O/W emulsion forming micelles . The increase in the surface from the micro/nanoparticles and the reduction in the molecular diffusion distance enhance the mass transport and reduce the response time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been proven by numerous research on polyacrylate based ion-selective electrodes [e.g. 17,18] as well as on polymeric microspheres [4,6,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Incorporation of molecules into the polymeric microspheres, in principle, can be achieved either during polymerization [4,6] or afterwards by absorption of molecules to ready spheres, e.g. during microspheres contact with mixed water/THF based solution containing the molecule of choice [15,16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation