1968
DOI: 10.1056/nejm196809122791102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescent-Antibody Test for Cytomegalovirus Macroglobulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity of the immunofluorescent test for CMV infection is confirmed by Hanshaw et al (1968). The most reliable method of detecting congenital CMV infection in newborn infants is virus isolation, but in case of negative virus isolation congenital CMV infection would not be deniable, because there would be a small amount of virus excretion in congenital CMV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specificity of the immunofluorescent test for CMV infection is confirmed by Hanshaw et al (1968). The most reliable method of detecting congenital CMV infection in newborn infants is virus isolation, but in case of negative virus isolation congenital CMV infection would not be deniable, because there would be a small amount of virus excretion in congenital CMV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recentry Hanshaw et al (1968) reported that CMV macroglobulin test was a convenient and sensitive method for the detection of cytomegalic inclusion disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of identification of pregnancies at risk therefore, as judged by virus excretion by the neonatal infant was 4/756 or 5 3 per 1000 in this study: this can be compared with the rate of 88 per 1000 unmarried mothers found in two studies in 1967 to 1969 (Collaborative Study, 1970) and from 1969. Ifthe two babies with IgM in their neonatal serum, but who failed to yield virus (Hanshaw, Sternfield & White, 1968), are also considered as congenital infections this rate would be 7 9 per 1000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HBs Ag, its antibody (anti-HBs) and anti-HAV were determined by ra dioimmunoassay Ausria II, Ausab, Havab, Abbott Laboratories). In patients with acute hepatitis and no serological evidence of hep atitis A or B, infection with cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus were excluded using an immunofluorescence technique [9] and an ox cell hemolysin test [10], respectively. Serum alanine amino trans ferase (ALAT) and ALP were assayed with an autoanalyzer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%