2007
DOI: 10.1364/oe.15.015493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence ratio thermometry in a microfluidic dual-beam laser trap

Abstract: The dual-beam laser trap is a versatile tool with many possible applications. In order to characterize its thermal properties in a microfluidic trap geometry we have developed a non-intrusive fluorescence ratio technique using the temperature sensitive dye Rhodamine B and the temperature independent reference dye Rhodamine 110. We measured temperature distribution profiles in the trap with submicron spatial resolution on a confocal laser-scanning microscope. The maximum heating in the center of the trap amount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
108
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This magnitude of heating is in agreement with experimentally observed laser-induced heating of vesicles by infrared optical tweezers (Liu et al, 1995), of DNA in an infrared optical trap (Braun and Libchaber, 2002), of micron-sized silica and polystyrene beads in a optical traps (Peterman et al, 2003), and temperature sensitive dyes in buffer suspension in an infrared dual-beam laser trap (Ebert et al, 2007). We find that for spot sizes with w s = 1-2 m, we have d hm = 32.7 m, which is comparable to the diameter of a neuronal growth cone.…”
Section: D Temperature Field For a Stationary Laser Spotsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This magnitude of heating is in agreement with experimentally observed laser-induced heating of vesicles by infrared optical tweezers (Liu et al, 1995), of DNA in an infrared optical trap (Braun and Libchaber, 2002), of micron-sized silica and polystyrene beads in a optical traps (Peterman et al, 2003), and temperature sensitive dyes in buffer suspension in an infrared dual-beam laser trap (Ebert et al, 2007). We find that for spot sizes with w s = 1-2 m, we have d hm = 32.7 m, which is comparable to the diameter of a neuronal growth cone.…”
Section: D Temperature Field For a Stationary Laser Spotsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous estimates of this effect in the optical neuronal guidance experiments suggested a negligible temperature increase (Albrecht-Buehler, 1991;Carnegie et al, 2008Carnegie et al, , 2009Ehrlicher et al, 2002;Graves et al, 2009;Higuchi et al, 2005Higuchi et al, , 2007Mohanty et al, 2005;Stevenson et al, 2006;Mathew et al, 2010;Koch et al, 2004), but our more detailed simulations show a temperature increase of the order 1 • C/100 mW of laser power, which is in agreement with experimental results and modelling from the field of optical trapping (Schönle and Hell, 1998;Braun and Libchaber, 2002;Peterman et al, 2003;Ebert et al, 2007). Furthermore, we find a temperature gradient of the order 1 • C/typical neuronal growth cone-radius.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Owing to the fact that the OS, operated at a wavelength of 1064 nm, might introduce additional heating effects that can impact cell rheology (34,38,39), we employed a MMM to confirm the impact of changes to suspended cell mechanical properties free from heating artifacts (see Materials and Methods). In this setup, cells were advected sequentially through a long microchannel with many constrictions smaller than the cell diameter using driving pressures within physiological range (50 mbar) (Fig.…”
Section: Cell Stiffening Correlates With Longer Advection Time Througmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained results on optical deformability showed a statistically significant difference (p < 10 −3 ) between all the five temperatures. As known from literature [10,21,22], laser power can induce a sudden increase of the cell temperature, making it difficult to compare the deformation values obtained at different optical power levels. As in our case the same optical power is applied to all OS measurements, we expect an increase of about 30°C in the irradiated region for all the samples, provided that absorption coefficient changes due to the different temperatures are negligible.…”
Section: Optical Deformation and Passage Through Constrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%