1989
DOI: 10.1021/ma00194a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence probes for evaluating chain solvation in network polymers. An analysis of the solvatochromic shift of the dansyl probe in macroporous styrene-divinylbenzene and styrene-diisopropenylbenzene copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 For example, dansyl dye has been used to monitor solvent amount and interaction in the cross-linked polystyrene matrix. 29 By placing different dyes in either PFSAc or PDBFS, we hoped to understand more about the specific interactions of these polymer matrixes with different functional groups on guest molecules. Thus, these fluorescent dyes served as binding species and "reporters" about binding interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 For example, dansyl dye has been used to monitor solvent amount and interaction in the cross-linked polystyrene matrix. 29 By placing different dyes in either PFSAc or PDBFS, we hoped to understand more about the specific interactions of these polymer matrixes with different functional groups on guest molecules. Thus, these fluorescent dyes served as binding species and "reporters" about binding interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) that is conjugated to the dansyl's electron system, which would have caused complete quenching of the dansyl fluorescense. 29 Thus, this dye can directly report polarity alteration of a resist matrix, irrespective of any change in its pH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is presented because some regions of MIP are highly cross-linked and therefore, the insertion/accessibility to them is limited. Another possible scenario is that in many cases, the template molecule does not present enough solubility in the porogen and therefore, cannot participate in interactions with the cavity of MIP [46,47]. The results from the above are not simple: (i) the most possible is a reduction of the total number of cavities suitable for rebinding ( Figure 3); (ii) the template can be "escaped" during the last step of elution mainly in MIPs used in columns for solid phase extraction [48] or during analysis [49].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the process requires covalent attachment, the template must be prefabricated into a polymerizable derivative of the intended target molecule. Classically, this preorganization approach has utilized template-monomer complexes formed by carboxylic ester linkages, boronate esters, ether linkages, imines, and ketal bonds, among others [53,58,59]. Despite the limitation in the functional groups that can be imprinted using the preorganization approach, effective MIP designs have demonstrated highly selective molecular recognition capabilities [60].…”
Section: Polymer Matrix Designmentioning
confidence: 99%