2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence lifetime distribution in phakic and pseudophakic healthy eyes

Abstract: Purpose To investigate the influence of the lens status and to describe fundus autofluorescence lifetimes (FLT) in a large cohort of healthy eyes across a wide age range. Materials and methods FLT data were acquired from healthy phakic and pseudophakic eyes using fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO). Retinal autofluorescence was excited with a 473 nm laser and emitted autofluorescence was detected in a short and a long spectral channel (SSC: 498–560 nm; LSC: 560–720 nm). Results 141 healthy … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, as described elsewhere in this article, no model can fully represent diseases of the human eye and τ m in mouse fundus differs from that of human fundus. 53 In contrast, FLIO was not constructed for the measurement of mice and this might lead to a discrepancy in spatial resolution of FLIO images owing to optic aberration of the mouse eye.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, as described elsewhere in this article, no model can fully represent diseases of the human eye and τ m in mouse fundus differs from that of human fundus. 53 In contrast, FLIO was not constructed for the measurement of mice and this might lead to a discrepancy in spatial resolution of FLIO images owing to optic aberration of the mouse eye.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lens autofluorescence is also known to influence the τ m in FLIO, particularly in the SCC 27 , 47 . Clinically, no cataract was present in the study participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%