2015
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, Immunohistochemistry, and Next-Generation Sequencing for Detection of EML4-ALK Rearrangement in Lung Cancer

Abstract: Background. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved method for detecting EML4-ALK rearrangement is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); however, data supporting the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for that purpose are accumulating. Previous studies that compared FISH and IHC considered FISH the gold standard, but none compared data with the results of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Materials and Methods. We studied FISH and IHC (D5F3 antibody) systematically for EML4-ALK rearrangemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
131
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
131
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a consistent body of evidence demonstrating that IHC is comparable, if not superior, to FISH (44,45). In a recent study (46), the sensitivity and specificity were 43% and 98% for FISH and 100% and 98% for IHC, respectively. Relevant discrepancies between FISH and IHC results have indeed been reported (47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Ihcmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is a consistent body of evidence demonstrating that IHC is comparable, if not superior, to FISH (44,45). In a recent study (46), the sensitivity and specificity were 43% and 98% for FISH and 100% and 98% for IHC, respectively. Relevant discrepancies between FISH and IHC results have indeed been reported (47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Ihcmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We report here 2 cases in which initial standard of care ALK testing by FISH yielded false positive results, leading to delays in determination of optimal systemic therapy. may occur due to variant forms of EML4-ALK rearrangements and/or RNA editing abnormalities resulting in intron changes that cannot be detected by FISH [4]. Several groups have published on the comparative accuracy of FISH, IHC, and NGS; however, the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these modalities have not been directly compared in large prospective trials to date [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I thank Dr. Uguen et al [1] for their comments on the study on the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the detection of EML4-ALK rearrangement in lung cancer [2]. The study under discussion aims to emphasize the obstacles in technology rather than provide incidence of ALK positivity in our cohort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%