2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15678-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence Imaging for Surgeons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have suggested that coupling of a CEA antibody with ICG could enable the detection of such lesions with this technology. 23,24 Furthermore, not all superficial lesions demonstrated ICG uptake. We do not have a direct explanation of this failure, but assume relation to patient and tumor specific factors, which could be investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Studies have suggested that coupling of a CEA antibody with ICG could enable the detection of such lesions with this technology. 23,24 Furthermore, not all superficial lesions demonstrated ICG uptake. We do not have a direct explanation of this failure, but assume relation to patient and tumor specific factors, which could be investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A diagnostic aid to help the clinician to delineate surgical margins would be very useful [7,10]. Recent trials on using tissue auto-fluorescence as a sensitive method to detect surgical margins have been described in various tumors such as breast cancer (BC) and have shown accurate results [11,12]. Poh et al [13] in Canada has used a similar device to detect field change around squamous cell carcinoma and found a positive correlation between loss of heterozygosity and fluorescence visualization loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%