2011
DOI: 10.3791/3437-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence detection methods for microfluidic droplet platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quenching impregnation in-line to remove unadsorbed metal ions could also be envisaged with a classical droplet splitting approach [30] combined with acoustophoresis [31,32] or centrifugal separation, both of which would become easier with the progressive aggregation of the carrier particles observed along the flow path (Figure S9, Supporting Information). Subsequently, indroplet fluorescence spectroscopy [33] of picoinjected molecular probes [34] enabled or quenched by metal ions could be used to directly or indirectly quantify the metal uptake on the carriers. Another interesting prospect is the direct use of microfluidically prepared catalysts for chemical reactions inside the droplet itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quenching impregnation in-line to remove unadsorbed metal ions could also be envisaged with a classical droplet splitting approach [30] combined with acoustophoresis [31,32] or centrifugal separation, both of which would become easier with the progressive aggregation of the carrier particles observed along the flow path (Figure S9, Supporting Information). Subsequently, indroplet fluorescence spectroscopy [33] of picoinjected molecular probes [34] enabled or quenched by metal ions could be used to directly or indirectly quantify the metal uptake on the carriers. Another interesting prospect is the direct use of microfluidically prepared catalysts for chemical reactions inside the droplet itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feedback-controlled system constantly monitors the instantaneous error and regulates the process variable towards the target based on the feedback signal. In recent years, researchers have explored fluorescence [7] or bright-field imaging [8] to detect droplet size which can serve as the feedback signal, but they can only measure the two-dimensional (2-D) droplet profile to derive an approximation of threedimensional (3-D) volume, with ignoring the curvature of droplet surface in the depth direction. As a result, there is always an unavoidable steady-state error between the expectant and actual volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%