2007
DOI: 10.1364/oe.15.015702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence component in the reflectance spectra from coastal waters. Dependence on water composition

Abstract: Based on HYDROLIGHT simulations of more than 2000 reflectance spectra from datasets typical of coastal waters with highly variable optically active constituents as well as on intercomparisons with field measurements, the magnitude of chlorophyll fluorescence was analyzed and parameterized as a function of phytoplankton, CDOM, and suspended inorganic matter concentrations. Using the parameterizations developed, we show that variations in the fluorescence component of water leaving radiance in coastal waters are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
74
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflectance spectrum showed a weak trough at 665 nm, which was caused by the Chl-a absorption maximum; this magnitude was affected by the Chl-a concentration and fluorescence contribution. 44 The reflectance peak at 680 nm resulted from the minimal combined absorption of phytoplankton, NAP, and water. 45 In the NIR band, the reflectance reached a minimum, approaching zero, which was caused by the increasing absorption by water and a relatively small scattering by NAP due to the low concentration of TSM.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflectance spectrum showed a weak trough at 665 nm, which was caused by the Chl-a absorption maximum; this magnitude was affected by the Chl-a concentration and fluorescence contribution. 44 The reflectance peak at 680 nm resulted from the minimal combined absorption of phytoplankton, NAP, and water. 45 In the NIR band, the reflectance reached a minimum, approaching zero, which was caused by the increasing absorption by water and a relatively small scattering by NAP due to the low concentration of TSM.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key difference among these models is the parameters of specific absorption and backscattering [9]. The chlorophyll concentration and a ph (λ) have a proportional relationship [71] that can be expressed as…”
Section: Simulating the Remote Sensing Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NAP concentration was calculated by subtracting the PSS (=0.0687 × Chla) from the TSS. The reflectance caused by chlorophyll fluorescence emission for Case 2 waters was also considered as proposed by Gilerson et al [71]. Fluorescence reflectance follows a Gaussian shape with a peak at 685 nm, a full-width half maximum of 25 nm and a standard deviation, σ, of 10.6 nm [74].…”
Section: Simulating the Remote Sensing Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the use of model type I is inaccurate and sometimes useless in optically complex waters due to the spectral overlap between phytoplankton and other dominant constituents affecting light attenuation (e.g., sediments, CDOM) [3,4,7]. Conversely, ocean color algorithms relying on chlorophyll-derived fluorescence signatures are less influenced by the presence of optical components having a strong light absorption (e.g., CDOM) or scattering (e.g., detritus) at the Soret bands [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%