1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79300-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence characteristics of 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine linked covalently to the 5' end of oligonucleotides: multiple conformers of single-stranded and double-stranded dye-DNA complexes

Abstract: Fluorescence steady-state and lifetime experiments have been carried out on duplex and single-stranded DNA molecules labeled at the 5' ends with 5-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TMRh). The temperature and ionic strength of the solutions were varied over large ranges. The results reveal at least three well-defined states of the TMRh-DNA molecules for the single-stranded as well as for the double-stranded DNA molecules. Two states are fluorescent, with lifetimes in the range of 0.5-1 ns and 2.5-3 ns. A third state… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
95
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
11
95
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To address the possibility of decreased energy transfer as a result of an increase in interfluorophore distance and potentially obtain some evidence for bend directionality, we performed steady state fluorescence experiments by moving the dye attachment from the 5Ј-to 3Ј-ends of the duplex. With evidence for TAMRA stacking on the end of duplex DNA (46,47), we assumed the TAMRA position would not change when moved from a 5Ј-to 3Ј-attachment point. Oligonucleotides with either the 5Ј-or 3Ј-end coupled to fluorophore were used to prepare duplexes modified at both 5Ј-or 3Ј-ends.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the possibility of decreased energy transfer as a result of an increase in interfluorophore distance and potentially obtain some evidence for bend directionality, we performed steady state fluorescence experiments by moving the dye attachment from the 5Ј-to 3Ј-ends of the duplex. With evidence for TAMRA stacking on the end of duplex DNA (46,47), we assumed the TAMRA position would not change when moved from a 5Ј-to 3Ј-attachment point. Oligonucleotides with either the 5Ј-or 3Ј-end coupled to fluorophore were used to prepare duplexes modified at both 5Ј-or 3Ј-ends.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the sequence of the oligonucleotide can affect the properties of the attached fluorophore. Time-resolved fluorescence studies of various tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-or TAMRA-labeled oligonucleotides demonstrate that the fluorophore can have multiple fluorescent lifetimes, suggesting that the probe exists in multiple environments (Edman et al, 1996;Eggeling et al, 1998;Harley et al, 2002;Vamosi et al, 1996). One of these lifetimes may involve an interaction between fluorophore and DNA bases, which can potentially quench fluorescence emission or otherwise affect the measured values (Sauer et al, 1995;Seidel et al, 1996;Sevenich et al, 1998).…”
Section: Designing the Oligonucleotidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of fluorophores, however, are often sensitive to pH and salt. For example, the fluorescence intensity of a TAMRA-labeled oligonucleotide can decrease with increasing NaCl concentrations, while its fluorescence anisotropy increases (Vamosi et al, 1996). Both fluorescence intensity and anisotropy of a TAMRA-labeled oligonucleotide decrease with increasing temperature (Vamosi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Designing the Oligonucleotidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with a collection efficiency of 10%, this is 100 μs∕photon. Because the excited state lifetime of the donor is <10 ns (41) and the 10 nearest neighbors contribute ∼90% of the FRET signal in our geometry (SI Methods), the probability that two donors will be simultaneously excited is <10 −3 . Based on the assumption that only one donor is excited at a time, the FRET efficiency per acceptor molecule is calculated by summing the contributions of each donor:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%