2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidization characteristics and fine coal dry beneficiation using a pronation-grille baffle dense phase medium fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because magnetite powder can be easily recovered and reused, it is primarily used for coal beneficiation in the gas-vibro fluidized bed. The bed density normally ranges from 1.8 to 2.3 g/ cm 3 if magnetite powder is used as the dense medium. As shown in Figure 2, due to the high bed density in a monodisperse particle system, it is necessary to investigate a method for decreasing separation density in the gas-vibro fluidized bed.…”
Section: Experimental System and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because magnetite powder can be easily recovered and reused, it is primarily used for coal beneficiation in the gas-vibro fluidized bed. The bed density normally ranges from 1.8 to 2.3 g/ cm 3 if magnetite powder is used as the dense medium. As shown in Figure 2, due to the high bed density in a monodisperse particle system, it is necessary to investigate a method for decreasing separation density in the gas-vibro fluidized bed.…”
Section: Experimental System and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the average ash content of coal with −1.6 g/cm 3 is 4.30%. In addition, coal with a density of −1.6 g/cm 3 accounts for the highest proportion, 72.53% of all samples. The aim of coal separation is to decrease the ash content to about 5%, while the separation density should be maintained near 1.6 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Acs Omegamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, fluidized bed reactors in the turbulent fluidization regime also have some inherent drawbacks like a high degree of gas solids back‐mixing with wide residence time distributions . As shown in Figure a, the performance of the first‐order reaction in a plug flow reactor (PFR) and mixed flow reactor (MFR) is compared .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%