2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidisation and packed bed behaviour in capillary tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As steady bed behaviour was achieved about 30 s after the step change, the last 30 seconds at a given flow rate were the focus of the subsequent analysis. The decreasing of the flow rate here averts pressure overshoot, which may be present due to the large particle-to-bed size ratios of the system (dp/Dh ~ 0.12 to 0.16 based on the micro-channel hydraulic diameter, Dh ~ 243.5µm, see Table 1) [36]. As a baseline for comparison of mixing behaviour, identical trials were also carried out in the same channel with no particles present.…”
Section: Fluidizing Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As steady bed behaviour was achieved about 30 s after the step change, the last 30 seconds at a given flow rate were the focus of the subsequent analysis. The decreasing of the flow rate here averts pressure overshoot, which may be present due to the large particle-to-bed size ratios of the system (dp/Dh ~ 0.12 to 0.16 based on the micro-channel hydraulic diameter, Dh ~ 243.5µm, see Table 1) [36]. As a baseline for comparison of mixing behaviour, identical trials were also carried out in the same channel with no particles present.…”
Section: Fluidizing Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its initial introduction by Potic et al [33], only a small number of studies have been reported on liquid fluidization in µFB. Whilst some of these studies have been application-focused [34,35], the vast majority have focused on hydrodynamic aspects of µFBs [28,31,36,37] and the effects of surface forces and wall effects on their fluidization behaviour [28,29,38,39]. Of these, only Doroodchi et al [31] have focused in detail on mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can see from this figure that the adhesion force becomes comparable to the drag force (ratio below 10) for approximately 300 µm glass particles and 2.5 mm PMMA particles, while they are equal for approximately 1 mm and 8 mm glass and PMMA particle diameter respectively. Based on this analysis and assuming a bed-to-particle ratio of 10, which is typical in micro-fluidized bed studies (Doroodchi et al, 2012;Potic et al, 2005;Zivkovic et al, 2013b), the rough boundary between micro-and macro-fluidization can be estimated to be between 1-10 mm for glass particles and between 10-80 mm for PMMA particles.…”
Section: Boundary Between Macro-and Micro-fluidizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have, however, not been exploited at all in the microfluidics context. Recent modelling (Derksen, 2008(Derksen, , 2009) and experimental work (Doroodchi et al, 2012;Potic et al, 2005;Zivkovic et al, 2013a;Zivkovic et al, 2013b) has demonstrated that microfluidic fluidized beds (termed henceforth 'microfluidized beds') are feasible, offering the potential to not only overcome diffusion-limited heat and mass transport in simple micron-sized channels, but also provide higher sensitivity and multi-modal detection in the diagnostic context by virtue of the large surface area per unit volume that comes from use of micro-particles (Derveaux et al, 2008;Lim and Zhang, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small test volumes and short residence times also make µPBs ideal for rapid, highthroughput catalyst screening (Cao et al, 2007, Ehrfeld et al, 2000, and in the liquid chromatography context in the pharmaceutical sector (Jung et al, 2009). They are also of relevance to micro-fluidized beds (Zivkovic et al, 2013a, Zivkovic et al, 2013b, Doroodchi et al, 2012, Doroodchi et al, 2013 in that they are clearly formed from packed beds. Beyond the process engineering context, µPBs are used in Micro Total Analysis Systems (µTAS), which have long been used for chemical and biochemical analysis (Reyes et al, 2002), including in clinical chemistry (also known as lab-on-a-chip or LOC) (Schulte et al, 2002, Melin and Quake, 2007, Haeberle et al, 2012, Abgrall and Gué, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%