1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(99)00173-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidelastic instability analysis of operating nuclear steam generator U-tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure of the heat transfer tube is outstanding issues for the steam generator design and manufacture. For effectively monitoring the steam generator health, solve many basis problems associated with failure of the heat transfer tube is very important, such as the vibration mechanism and related structural dynamics [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The tube diameter is nearly 5m in Large-capacity steam generator U-tube section, U-shaped bend radius is very large range from 0 to 2.5m which of affect is clear to heat transfer tube vibration.…”
Section: Intorductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of the heat transfer tube is outstanding issues for the steam generator design and manufacture. For effectively monitoring the steam generator health, solve many basis problems associated with failure of the heat transfer tube is very important, such as the vibration mechanism and related structural dynamics [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The tube diameter is nearly 5m in Large-capacity steam generator U-tube section, U-shaped bend radius is very large range from 0 to 2.5m which of affect is clear to heat transfer tube vibration.…”
Section: Intorductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferng and Ma 7 and Ferng and Chang 8 considered the secondary vapor–liquid two-phase flow domain as a porous media domain—but without the addition of TSPs—and simplified the primary heating as an internal heat source in the SG to ultimately analyze secondary side thermal–hydraulic behaviors and predict the distribution of FIV damage in the U-bend region. Jo and Shin 9 and Jo et al. 10 performed a thermal–hydraulic analysis to provide a detailed three-dimensional two-phase flow field in the SG secondary region, but again without regard to TSPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%