2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.c032725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid/Structure-Interaction Analysis of the Fish-Bone-Active-Camber Morphing Concept

Abstract: A coupled, partitioned fluid-structure interaction analysis is introduced for calculation of the deformed equilibrium shape, aerodynamic coefficients, and actuation requirements of the Fish Bone Active Camber morphing concept. The Fish Bone Active Camber concept is a high authority morphing camber architecture with a broad range of applications; including fixed wing aircraft, helicopters, wind turbines, and tidal stream turbines. The low chordwise bending stiffness of the morphing structure, high stiffness of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial study here will show how the BTNS mechanism can be applied for energy balancing in a morphing application, as most morphing applications require external actuation, and many have high internal structural loads to overcome, for example [27]. A recently introduced active camber concept known as the fish bone active camber (FishBAC) mechanism is considered as the load in this paper [28,29]. In this case, both the aerodynamic load and the elastic deformation of the structure were considered and the analytical formulation was derived from Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.…”
Section: Case Study: Morphing Wing Section and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial study here will show how the BTNS mechanism can be applied for energy balancing in a morphing application, as most morphing applications require external actuation, and many have high internal structural loads to overcome, for example [27]. A recently introduced active camber concept known as the fish bone active camber (FishBAC) mechanism is considered as the load in this paper [28,29]. In this case, both the aerodynamic load and the elastic deformation of the structure were considered and the analytical formulation was derived from Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.…”
Section: Case Study: Morphing Wing Section and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 14 shows the predicted shapes of the morphed profiles for the range of the tendon pulley rotation angles studied, along with a schematic representation of the spine bending displacement. This structural model is analytical and derived from Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, and the torque produced by the pulley rotation is assumed to induce a moment on the FishBAC [28]. The required moment to actuate the active camber is provided by a rotary actuator, which can be solved by prescribing the tendon spooling pulley rotation angle, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Case Study: Morphing Wing Section and Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional structure may increase the weight and negate any aerodynamic improvements being realised for mission efficiency. Cross-sectional parameters, such as camber [15][16][17], can be used to improve flight efficiency through improving the spanwise lift distribution. Modifications to the wing cross-section require potentially fewer structural compromises and less added mass than planform changes, but possibly offer only marginal gains in efficiency when compared to span morphing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, a static aeroelastic analysis procedure is developed using an aerodynamic routine Xfoil, a two-dimensional viscous panel model which has been widely used for aerofoil design and fluid/structure coupling analysis (Woods et al, 2015;Daynes and Weaver 2012b). In the aero-structural design optimization procedures, aerodynamic loads are calculated and transferred to the structural model noting that different ways have been used in the literature (De Gaspari et al, 2011):…”
Section: Static Aeroelastic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%