Fluid Sketching―Immersive Sketching Based on Fluid Flow

Eroglu, Sevinc; Gebhardt, Sascha; Schmitz, Peter; Hausch, Dominik; Kuhlen, Torsten

doi:10.1109/vr.2018.8446595

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The nature of these two interfaces makes them good candidates for this task as it is natural and easy to point at things with the eyes/head. For the confirmation task alone, only the use of the voice was found in the literature with a non-verbal "blow" action [119,120] used for confirming the selection of an object being targeted with a Manipulation 5 [11,25,45,63,90] Modification 5 [11,15,30,45,56] Creation 3 [45,90,117] N/A 4 [1,36,94,100] controller.…”

Section: Interaction Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding other interaction tasks, in [25] it was possible to interact with a cloud of particles by "blowing" at them to manipulate their state, in this case, their displacement values. In [56] speech was used to modify the colors of objects by head gazing at them and then spelling the intended color.…”

Section: Interaction Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the studies ask users on their sentiment towards the interfaces being evaluated and their feedback on them (e.g., [37,114,115,119]) and which interfaces they preferred to use (e.g., [31,117]) through custom made questionnaires, some of which (e.g., [2,85]) based on ISO 9241 [49] . A few validated questionnaires for user sentiment and preference were the User Experience Questionnaire [64] used by [98], the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Survey [19] used by [71,72], and the AttrackDiff Questionnaire [44] used in [25]. A few studies (e.g., [98,120]) used the System Usability Scale Questionnaire [54], while others (e.g.…”

Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Usability Satisfaction 31 [2,8,10,11,17,25,26,31,35,37,45,55,62,66,67,[70][71][72]78,[83][84][85]90,95,98,99,114,115,117,119,120] Efficiency 25 [2, 8, 10, 31, 35, 37, 45-47, 55, 60, 66-68, 75, 83-85, 95, 98, 113-115, 119, 120] Efficacy 23 [2, 8, 10, 23, 24, 31, 36, 37, 45, 55, 56, 62, 66-68, 85, 95, 98, 104, 113, 115, 119, 120] Mental State Subjective 9 [11,23,45,72,81,90,98,99,110] Objective 1 [60] Physical State Subjective 5 [11,47,67,76,98] Objective 4 [4,8,…”

Section: Evaluation Metric N Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Hands-free interaction in immersive virtual reality: A systematic review

Monteiro

Gonçalves

Coelho

et al. 2021

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hands are the most important tool to interact with virtual environments, and they should be available to perform the most critical tasks. For example, a surgeon in VR should keep his/her hands on the instruments and be able to do secondary tasks without performing a disruptive event to the operative task. In this common scenario, one can observe that hands are not available for interaction. The goal of this systematic review is to survey the literature and identify which hands-free interfaces are used, the performed interaction tasks, what metrics are used for interface evaluation, and the results of such evaluations. From 80 studies that met the eligibility criteria, the voice is the most studied interface, followed by the eye and head gaze. Some novel interfaces were brain interfaces and face expressions. System control and selection represent most of the interaction tasks studied and most studies evaluate interfaces for usability. Despite the best interface depending on the task and study, the voice was found to be versatile and showed good results amongst the studies. More research is recommended to improve the practical use of the interfaces and to evaluate the interfaces more formally.

show abstract

Section: Interaction Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Interaction Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Evaluation Metric N Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Hands-free interaction in immersive virtual reality: A systematic review

Monteiro

Gonçalves

Coelho

et al. 2021

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Popular drawing applications incorporate complex models of paint interaction based on physical properties, and research investigates novel algorithms and interaction techniques that emulate the analog creation process [2][3][4]. Sevinc Eroglu et al recently presented a drawing tool for VR inspired by the analog paper marbling technique [5].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rilievo: Artistic Scene Authoring via Interactive Height Map Extrusion in VR

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors present a virtual authoring environment for artistic creation in VR. It enables the effortless conversion of 2D images into volumetric 3D objects. Artistic elements in the input material are extracted with a convenient VR-based segmentation tool. Relief sculpting is then performed by interactively mixing different height maps. These are automatically generated from the input image structure and appearance. A prototype of the tool is showcased in an analog-virtual artistic workflow in collaboration with a traditional painter. It combines the expressiveness of analog painting and sculpting with the creative freedom of spatial arrangement in VR.

show abstract