Fluid simulation of comet P/Halley’s ionosphere

Baumgärtel, K.; Sauer, K.

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82971-0_56

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Global three-dimensional MHD models, such as that of Schmidt et al [1986], do an excellent job of describing the large-scale structure of the cometary plasma, but some interesting small-scale structure also exists which requires a model with very good spatial resolution [Cravens, 1989a, b]. The Baumg'drtel and Sauer [1987] model results indicate the existence of a density enhancement at the cavity boundary, suggesting the need for another look at this region. And, highresolution magnetometer data (reproduced here in Figure 3) indicate that the magnetic field profile is especially steep, within a thin (25 km wide) layer, located just outside the CS [Neubauer, 1988].…”

mentioning

confidence: 69%

A magnetohydrodynamical model of the inner coma of comet Halley

Cravens

1989

J. Geophys. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The magnetometer onboard the Giotto spacecraft observed a diamagnetic cavity surrounding the nucleus of comet Halley. The location of the boundary of this diamagnetic cavity is determined by a balance between an inward magnetic pressure gradient force and an outward ion‐neutral drag force, associated with collisions between the outwardly flowing neutrals and the stagnated ions. A one‐dimensional, time‐dependent, magnetohydrodynamical model has been developed for the inner coma of comet Halley, and includes ion‐neutral collisions, photochemical production and loss of plasma, and finite conductivity. This model is used to investigate the plasma dynamics in the vicinity of the diamagnetic cavity boundary surface. A narrow transition layer with enhanced plasma density is shown to exist just inside the boundary, although a full understanding of this layer will require a two‐ or three‐dimensional MHD model. The flux of cometary ions into this shocklike layer is removed by electron‐ion recombination. The thickness of this layer is determined by the Mach number of the incident flow.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 69%