2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid-overpressure Driven Sediment Mobilisation and Its Risk for the Integrity for CO2 Storage Sites – An Analogue Modelling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamental attempts to describe fluidization in cohesive granular media mainly focused on gas invading dry materials [124]. In this configuration, laboratory experiments pointed out different regimes: low-cohesive grains mostly displayed expansion and pipe formation, while cohesive sediments exhibited uplift and tensile fractures [125]. A more detailed experimental and numerical study by Galland et al [126] pointed out the importance of two dimensionless parameters, (1) the ratio between the fluid pressure and the gravitational stress, and (2) the fluid pressure-to-host rock strength ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental attempts to describe fluidization in cohesive granular media mainly focused on gas invading dry materials [124]. In this configuration, laboratory experiments pointed out different regimes: low-cohesive grains mostly displayed expansion and pipe formation, while cohesive sediments exhibited uplift and tensile fractures [125]. A more detailed experimental and numerical study by Galland et al [126] pointed out the importance of two dimensionless parameters, (1) the ratio between the fluid pressure and the gravitational stress, and (2) the fluid pressure-to-host rock strength ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional scanning electron microscope images can be found in the supporting information. (b) Sketch of the experimental setup illustrating the upper experimental box (dimensions: 80 × 5 × 60 cm) and the lower pressure chamber (PC; modified from Warsitzka et al, 2017). Furthermore, the main deformation structures are indicated in the cover layer: forced fold, crestal fracture, and wing fractures.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sedimentary basins are characterized by successive deposits, which appear as multiple reflectors in the seismic profiles, making it look like a geological millefeuille, with multiple layers exhibiting different physical properties (Figure 1). To our knowledge, few studies in the literature consider the effect of discontinuities, i.e., interfaces between two layers of different properties, on sediment mobilization and fluid escape structures [16,19,30]. The few existing works mainly focus on the effect of cohesion of the covering layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%