2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enrev.2022.100007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid injection-induced fault slip during unconventional energy development: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moment magnitude can be calculated with [44] M w = 2 3 log 10 M 0 − 9.1 (17) Injection-induced fault activity can be classified into three categories on the basis of slip velocity: creep and slow slip, aseismic slip, and seismic slip [3]. In this study, slip nodes are considered to be seismic slip only if they satisfy two conditions: (1) the Coulomb failure stress is greater than 0.2 MP, and (2) the slip velocity is greater than 0.2 mm/s.…”
Section: Distribution Of Seismic Slip Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moment magnitude can be calculated with [44] M w = 2 3 log 10 M 0 − 9.1 (17) Injection-induced fault activity can be classified into three categories on the basis of slip velocity: creep and slow slip, aseismic slip, and seismic slip [3]. In this study, slip nodes are considered to be seismic slip only if they satisfy two conditions: (1) the Coulomb failure stress is greater than 0.2 MP, and (2) the slip velocity is greater than 0.2 mm/s.…”
Section: Distribution Of Seismic Slip Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shale gas, as an unconventional energy source, has gained significant attention. Recently, the occurrence of fault reactivation induced by fluid injection during the stimulation process has been widely concerning for researchers [1][2][3]. Previous studies highlighted the influence of both geologic and engineering factors, such as pre-existing fractures and hydraulic fracturing schemes, on fault slip and earthquakes [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have partially solved the first two problems based on some developed models (Dinske et al, 2008; Shapiro et al, 2005, 2006; Talwani & Acree, 1985). However, the third problem has not been well solved (Kohl & Megel, 2007; Rahman et al, 2002; Willis‐Richards et al, 1996; Wu et al, 2022; Zang et al, 2014). In fact, the third problem, the establishment of a model for predicting the amplitude of earthquake events, is related to the fundamental problem of earthquake prediction.…”
Section: Dynamic Models For Earthquake Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injection of fluids at very high pressure leads to loss of frictional strength along the fault plane and a decrease in effective overburden stress conditions in the fluid-pressurized zone. This leads to an increase in driving shear stress and loss of frictional coefficient due to lubrication in sandstones [97,106,107]. The induced stress change can also contribute to activating remote faults depending on the difference between the injection rate and diffusion rate of the fluid injected in the reservoir.…”
Section: Laboratory Studies Of Injection-induced Fault Reactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%