1987
DOI: 10.1029/jb092ib02p01337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid flow through rock joints: The effect of surface roughness

Abstract: Fluid flow through rock joints is commonly described by the parallel plate model where the volume flow rate varies as the cube of the joint aperture. However, deviations from this model are expected because real joint surfaces are rough and contact each other at discrete points. To examine this problem further, a computer simulation of flow between rough surfaces was done. Realistic rough surfaces were generated numerically using a fractal model of surface topography. Pairs of these surfaces were placed togeth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
583
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 870 publications
(628 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
19
583
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our investigation demonstrate that bulk permeability at great depth in the brittle crust (3 -7 km depth) appears to be controlled by critically-stressed fractures and faults as previously reported by Barton et al [1995] at much shallower depths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of our investigation demonstrate that bulk permeability at great depth in the brittle crust (3 -7 km depth) appears to be controlled by critically-stressed fractures and faults as previously reported by Barton et al [1995] at much shallower depths.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The transition length between mated and unmated behavior is -1/X/-N of the lattice size, so that the complete surface contains a large number of No mechanical model of deformation is assumed; wherever the surfaces "interpenetrate," a contact (i.e., aperture zero) is shown [Brown, 1987]. This approximation is justified because we remain at relatively small contact areas; Walsh et al [1997] verified that the effect of using the interpenetrating model (versus a fracture wall deformation model [see, e.g., Unger and Mase [1993]) on predicted flow properties is negligible for the contact areas even as large as 30%.…”
Section: Three Dimensions: Importance Of Contacts and Non-lcl Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these assumption, the NavierStokes equation reduces to the Reynolds equation [Pinkus and Sternlicht, 1961;Brown, 1987]:…”
Section: Solving Under Lubrication Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%