1976
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450540105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid flow pattern, minimum spouting velocity and pressure drop in spouted beds

Abstract: This study extends the theory of Mamuro and Hattori to beds of less than the maximum spoutable height. The new model gives predictions for the fluid flow pattern, minimum spouting velocity and spouting pressure drop which are in agreement both with experimental data on beds spouted with air and water (obtained in this study) and with literature data.A correlation for Hm in water spouted beds of spherical glass particles is also presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
22
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 and Table 3 show that previous equations for predicting minimum spouting velocities may be in error by con- siderable margins for large columns. The Grbavcic et al (1976) equation for spherical particles appears to work well, but more data are needed for rounded particles to test it. The Grbavcic et al (1976) equation for spherical particles appears to work well, but more data are needed for rounded particles to test it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 and Table 3 show that previous equations for predicting minimum spouting velocities may be in error by con- siderable margins for large columns. The Grbavcic et al (1976) equation for spherical particles appears to work well, but more data are needed for rounded particles to test it. The Grbavcic et al (1976) equation for spherical particles appears to work well, but more data are needed for rounded particles to test it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows that there is a signficiant difference between the pressure measured in the inlet tube, AP,,, and APs, obtained by extrapolating the experimental data to z = 0. Although such differences have been reported by others (GrbavEiC et al, 1976;Epstein et al, 1978) they cannot be calculated quantitatively because the fluid mechanical condition just downstream from the inlet to the spout is difficult to describe accurately. In the absence of an experimental value for APsi, the calculated value of APlns is a reasonable approximation of it in a flat bottom column.…”
Section: Spout-annulus Interfacial Pressure Conditionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The measured value of APsi/APM is 0.830. Equation (8) does a much better job of predicting the profile than do the other equations (Lefroy and Davidson, 1969;GrbavEiC et al, 1976). Note in Figure 5 that the experimental profile is approaching the diagonal line which represents the profile in a fluidized bed.…”
Section: Spout-annulus Interfacial Pressure Conditionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…More rigorous expressions for coned bottom spouted beds have been derived by Rovero et al (1983), but Equation (1) is used here for simplicity. Applying Equation (1) at the top of the annulus, the minimum superficial spouting velocity is obtained (Grbavcic et al, 1976) Outlet conditiors f Uo ,Gout where z, = ( D , -d0)/2 tan (8/2). The volume fraction of the spout phase (6) is assumed constant throughout.…”
Section: Annulus Gas Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%