2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-015-1514-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid flow and mass transfer over circular strands using the lattice Boltzmann method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these works simulated flow in a geometry of the employed scaffold obtained by microtomography, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and when the geometry of the scaffold is built by three-dimensional printing, the model used in the simulations is draw using of the same parameters of the printing. [14][15][16] For this application the flow field has been modeled by the finite volume method, 8,9,14,17 the finite element method, 15,16,18 and the lattice Boltzmann method 7,8,[10][11][12][13]19 with results similar to experimental data, however not precise to these. Pennella et al 13 explain some causes of the difference between the permeability values obtained experimentally and those calculated by computational fluid dynamic among which are the reconstructed scaffold volumes are in different orders of magnitude than the experimental samples and the resolution of the microtomography images used to reconstruct the three-dimensional models is not adequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these works simulated flow in a geometry of the employed scaffold obtained by microtomography, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and when the geometry of the scaffold is built by three-dimensional printing, the model used in the simulations is draw using of the same parameters of the printing. [14][15][16] For this application the flow field has been modeled by the finite volume method, 8,9,14,17 the finite element method, 15,16,18 and the lattice Boltzmann method 7,8,[10][11][12][13]19 with results similar to experimental data, however not precise to these. Pennella et al 13 explain some causes of the difference between the permeability values obtained experimentally and those calculated by computational fluid dynamic among which are the reconstructed scaffold volumes are in different orders of magnitude than the experimental samples and the resolution of the microtomography images used to reconstruct the three-dimensional models is not adequate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%