2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid elemental and stable isotope composition of the Nibelungen hydrothermal field (8°18′S, Mid-Atlantic Ridge): Constraints on fluid–rock interaction in heterogeneous lithosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2F) and the main Irina II complex (Fig. The Nibelungen fluid composition reflects ultramafic signatures with some influence of reactions with gabbroic rocks (Schmidt et al, 2011), which is comparable with that at Logatchev. The Nibelungen vent field is also located off-axis, approximately 6 km south of a non-transform offset between two adjacent ridge segments and 9 km east of the presently active ridge segment, and is related to a prominent eastward-facing fault scarp (Melchert et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…2F) and the main Irina II complex (Fig. The Nibelungen fluid composition reflects ultramafic signatures with some influence of reactions with gabbroic rocks (Schmidt et al, 2011), which is comparable with that at Logatchev. The Nibelungen vent field is also located off-axis, approximately 6 km south of a non-transform offset between two adjacent ridge segments and 9 km east of the presently active ridge segment, and is related to a prominent eastward-facing fault scarp (Melchert et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The reason for this is that the total Cu and Zn fluid concentration is dominated by the particulate phase already at low mixing ratios of vent fluid with seawater. In contrast, only a small fraction of the total Fe content of the fluid is precipitated (mostly <10%, Schmidt et al [2011] compare fluid composition of filtered and non‐filtered samples from the Logatchev I vent field). Moreover, the fraction of Fe precipitating increases with fluid dilution by seawater (Figure 3), which is counteracting a positive correlation between particle and fluid concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, a major difference in the Mo content of the smoke particles between Logatchev I and 5°S, with higher concentrations in 5°S particles (average 50 nM) and lower in Logatchev I (mostly between 8 and 20 nM, or often below detection limit). This might be related to higher fluid concentrations of Mo at 5°S (end‐member concentrations of 32–62 nM at Turtle Pits (K. Schmidt, unpublished data, 2006, 2008; V. Klevenz, unpublished data, 2009)) compared to those at Logatchev I (calculated end‐member concentrations of 0–6 nM [ Schmidt et al , 2011]) which can likely be attributed to the very high fluid temperature during venting at Turtle Pits (∼400°C), increasing the solubility of Mo [ Rempel et al , 2006]. The Mo content in the mixed fluid at Logatchev I can be ascribed mainly to seawater, which contains high concentrations of Mo (119 nM [ Schmidt et al , 2011]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems are widespread ranging from the mid-ocean ridges such as Rainbow (Charlou et al, 1998 and Logatchev Douville et al, 2002;Schmidt et al, 2007) in the MidAtlantic Ridge and Kairei in the Central Indian Ridge (Nakamura et al, 2009); to off-axis of the ridges, such as at Lost City (Kelley et al, 2001(Kelley et al, , 2005 and Nibelungen (Schmidt et al, 2011); to the forearc, such as the Oman ophiolite (Neal and Stanger, 1983) and the Marian forearc (Mottl et al, 2003). Similar settings also exist in Precambrian ultramafic rocks such as the green belts in the Canadian and Fennoscandian Shields and South Africa .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%