2017
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid Bolus Over 15–20 Versus 5–10 Minutes Each in the First Hour of Resuscitation in Children With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial*

Abstract: Children receiving fluid boluses over 5-10 minutes each had a higher risk of intubation than those receiving boluses over 15-20 minutes each. Notwithstanding the lack of difference in risk of mortality and the possibility that a lower threshold of intubation and mechanical ventilation was used in the presence of fluid overload, our results raise concerns on the current recommendation of administering boluses over 5-10 minutes each in children with septic shock.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Three RCTs of different volume resuscitation strategies in children with septic shock in settings in which advanced supportive care (e.g., intubation, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care) was accessible have been published [180][181][182]. These studies have a combined total of only 316 children and showed no difference in mortality between the restrictive and liberal fluid resuscitation groups (Supplemental Table 4 In geographic settings in which advanced supportive care, including mechanical ventilation, is limited and/ or intensive care is not routinely accessible, the only large-scale RCT of different bolus fluid volume resuscitation strategies in severe infection in children was the Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST) study (Supplemental Table 4 and Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: We Recommend Removal Of Intravascular Access Devices That Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three RCTs of different volume resuscitation strategies in children with septic shock in settings in which advanced supportive care (e.g., intubation, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care) was accessible have been published [180][181][182]. These studies have a combined total of only 316 children and showed no difference in mortality between the restrictive and liberal fluid resuscitation groups (Supplemental Table 4 In geographic settings in which advanced supportive care, including mechanical ventilation, is limited and/ or intensive care is not routinely accessible, the only large-scale RCT of different bolus fluid volume resuscitation strategies in severe infection in children was the Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST) study (Supplemental Table 4 and Supplemental Fig.…”
Section: We Recommend Removal Of Intravascular Access Devices That Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Tertiary care teaching hospitals of our country report mortality of >40%. [4][5][6][7] Although septic shock patients commonly have myocardial dysfunction [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and is associated with high mortality, 12 it is reversible by 7-10 days among survivors. [16][17][18] Myocardial dysfunction is conventionally assessed by echocardiography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observaron que la utilización de bolos en menos de 10 minutos presentaba mayores riesgos de necesitar IE que administrarlos en 15-20 minutos. 34 Se sugiere un tiempo límite de 30 minutos como meta más razonable.…”
Section: Tratamiento (Figura 1)unclassified