2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluency Bank: A new resource for fluency research and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DL saves feature engineering costs by automatically generating relevant features, however require substantial amounts of annotated data. Most stuttering identification studies so far are based on in-house datsets [3,30,33,71,72] with limited speakers. In stuttering domain, there is a lack of datasets and several stuttering datasets that have been collected so far are discussed below: .…”
Section: Datasets For Stuttering Detection Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DL saves feature engineering costs by automatically generating relevant features, however require substantial amounts of annotated data. Most stuttering identification studies so far are based on in-house datsets [3,30,33,71,72] with limited speakers. In stuttering domain, there is a lack of datasets and several stuttering datasets that have been collected so far are discussed below: .…”
Section: Datasets For Stuttering Detection Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FluencyBank. This is a shared database for the study of fluency development which has been developed by Nan Bernstein Ratner (University of Maryland) and Brian MacWhinney (Carnegie Mellon University) [3]. The platform proposes audio and video files with transcriptions of adults and children who stutter.…”
Section: Torgo This Was Developed By a Collaboration Between Departme...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include the Developmental Sentence Score (DSS, Lee, 1974) and the Index of Productive Syntax (IPSyn, Scarborough, 1990) for child language, as wells as the Northwestern Narrative Language Analysis (NNLA, Thompson et al, 1995), Quantitative Production Analysis (QPA, Rochon, Saffran, Berndt, & Schwartz, 2000), and Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater (CPIDR, Brown, Snodgrass, Kemper, Herman, & Covington, 2008) for aphasia. Both the basic measures and the more complex profile measures are then packaged together into either the KIDEVAL system for child language, the EVAL system for adult language analysis, or the FLUCALC system for stuttering (Bernstein Ratner & MacWhinney, 2018). Using these systems, a researcher or clinician can summarize the data for a group or a single participant and can compare a single participant with reference groups from the TalkBank database.…”
Section: Talkbank Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, we must reiterate that we had very little power to detect these effects given a sample size of 50 children. The fact that we did suggests that future work examining language growth with a larger sample may yield stronger effects, though we hold off on speculating further until such data are available, perhaps in future years by combining research data from multiple sites, which is the goal of Fluency Bank (Bernstein Ratner & MacWhinney, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%