1991
DOI: 10.3985/wmr.2.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flue Gas Purification for MSW Incinerations. The Special Issue on the Flue Gas Purification for MSW Incinerators.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the major gas treatment method is dry dust removal, including electrostatic precipitators, baghouse dust collection, and electric-bag composite dust cleaning. 25 There are also wet treatments, such as spraying water on the gas and water burying. The disadvantages of flue gas treatments above are as follows: the initial capital investment for an electrostatic precipitator is significant, and the working process requires a high energy consumption; 6,7 the baghouse filter also has a high energy consumption, and it is difficult to replace the bag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the major gas treatment method is dry dust removal, including electrostatic precipitators, baghouse dust collection, and electric-bag composite dust cleaning. 25 There are also wet treatments, such as spraying water on the gas and water burying. The disadvantages of flue gas treatments above are as follows: the initial capital investment for an electrostatic precipitator is significant, and the working process requires a high energy consumption; 6,7 the baghouse filter also has a high energy consumption, and it is difficult to replace the bag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%