2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flue gas and pure CO2 sorption properties of coal: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common known adsorbents are activated carbons and zeolites being exploited for CO 2 separation and storage. Zeolites could adsorb a higher quantity of CO 2 than does by activated carbon at low operating pressures (< 20 kPa) [4,5], whereas carbon-based adsorbents are better for CO 2 storage applications [5,6]. Conversely, the obvious merits of carbon adsorbents over zeolites are cost penalties, hydrostability, lower regeneration energy, and easiness of production on a commercial scale [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common known adsorbents are activated carbons and zeolites being exploited for CO 2 separation and storage. Zeolites could adsorb a higher quantity of CO 2 than does by activated carbon at low operating pressures (< 20 kPa) [4,5], whereas carbon-based adsorbents are better for CO 2 storage applications [5,6]. Conversely, the obvious merits of carbon adsorbents over zeolites are cost penalties, hydrostability, lower regeneration energy, and easiness of production on a commercial scale [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Its surface properties can vary considerably, but its approximate pure-CO 2 sorption capacity can be as high as 10 wt % and its carbon dioxide/nitrogen (CO 2 / N 2 ) selectivity is on the order of 10, at 1 bar and 25°C. [12][13][14][15] Other types of carbonaceous sorbents, such as charcoal and coal, have been studied in a different CO 2 context; [16][17][18][19] however, they have not been explored or proposed for carbon capture from flue gas yet. For example, in the context of displacing coal-bed methane with CO 2 , it has been shown that virgin coal has a higher capacity for CO 2 than it does for methane, 19 again, only at elevated pressures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aluminophosphates (ALPO) have been shown to be interesting materials to separate CO 2 from CO 2 -N 2 mixtures as obtained from flue gas [4]. CO 2 separated from the mixture can afterwards be sequestered in geological deposits [5].…”
Section: -N 2 Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%