2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4932972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuations of local electric field and dipole moments in water between metal walls

Abstract: We examine the thermal fluctuations of the local electric field E loc k and the dipole moment µ k in liquid water at T = 298 K between metal walls in electric field applied in the perpendicular direction. We use analytic theory and molecular dynamics simulation. In this situation, there is a global electrostatic coupling between the surface charges on the walls and the polarization in the bulk. Then, the correlation function of the polarization density pz(r) along the applied field contains a homogeneous part … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fluctuations mimic the electrostatic contributions of image charges and are consistent with a textbook description of a metal in that they obey the Johnson-Nyquist relation (29). As found in other studies (30)(31)(32), this description of the electrostatic environment results in an electrostatic potential that is rapidly varying near the electrode, but homogeneous in the bulk, with concomitant Gaussian electric field fluctuations (24). Other electronic degrees of freedom, such as those that determine the details of water-platinum binding, are described implicitly by using empirical interaction potentials.…”
Section: Simulating Rare Events In Heterogeneous Environmentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…These fluctuations mimic the electrostatic contributions of image charges and are consistent with a textbook description of a metal in that they obey the Johnson-Nyquist relation (29). As found in other studies (30)(31)(32), this description of the electrostatic environment results in an electrostatic potential that is rapidly varying near the electrode, but homogeneous in the bulk, with concomitant Gaussian electric field fluctuations (24). Other electronic degrees of freedom, such as those that determine the details of water-platinum binding, are described implicitly by using empirical interaction potentials.…”
Section: Simulating Rare Events In Heterogeneous Environmentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…At hydrophobic surfaces, however, a depletion layer and a finite slip length are observed, indicating a decreased effective viscosity [4,5,6,7,8,9,19,20,21]. The interfacial dielectric profile of water has been studied using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [4,5,6,7,8,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], revealing a highly inhomogeneous and oscillating profile near the interface [22,23]. Whereas an effective interfacial dielectric constant can be readily obtained from capacitance measurements, experimental determination of the interfacial viscosity has been controversial [27,28,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figs.9 and 10(b), the dipoles next to the walls are parallel or antiparallel to the z axis (along [111]), whose distances from the walls are about 0.5. This is due to their interaction with the image dipoles in the walls (see Appendix A) 69,71,72 . For ∆Φ = 0, these two orientations appear equally on the average due to the toptail symmetry of our spheroidal dipoles.…”
Section: F Orientation Near Metal Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical calculations were preformed on CRAY XC40 at YITP in Kyoto University and on SGI ICE XA/UV at ISSP in the University of Tokyo. Appendix A: Electrostatics of dipole systems Here, we explain the electrostatics of dipoles between metal walls in applied field [68][69][70][71][72] . The electric potential due to the image dipoles is equivalent to that due to the surface charge densities, written as σ 0 (x, y) at z = 0 and σ H (x, y) at z = H. Without adsorption and ionization on the surfaces, the dipole centers are somewhat away from the walls (see the comment below Eq.…”
Section: Summary and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation