2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.103.l220404
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuation-induced interactions and the spin-glass transition inFe2TiO5

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, since techniques for atom identification in the solid state, such as energy dispersive atomic spectroscopy, possess systematic uncertainty in ratios between constituent atoms, we rely here on the susceptibility itself to determine the concentration of Fe in each sample. This approach relies on our previously reported measurement of χ (T) in Fe 2 TiO 5 for temperatures between 400 K and 900 K, which yielded an effective moment of µ eff = 6.12 ± 0.05 µ B , in reasonable agreement with the value µ eff = 5.92 µ B expected for a free S = 5/2 ion [2]. Since the most concentrated compound of the series yielded an effective moment close to the theoretical value, it is reasonable to expect that the effective moment in more dilute compounds will be identical since the chemical environment and oxidation states are the same.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, since techniques for atom identification in the solid state, such as energy dispersive atomic spectroscopy, possess systematic uncertainty in ratios between constituent atoms, we rely here on the susceptibility itself to determine the concentration of Fe in each sample. This approach relies on our previously reported measurement of χ (T) in Fe 2 TiO 5 for temperatures between 400 K and 900 K, which yielded an effective moment of µ eff = 6.12 ± 0.05 µ B , in reasonable agreement with the value µ eff = 5.92 µ B expected for a free S = 5/2 ion [2]. Since the most concentrated compound of the series yielded an effective moment close to the theoretical value, it is reasonable to expect that the effective moment in more dilute compounds will be identical since the chemical environment and oxidation states are the same.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, it is also likely impossible to describe the complete anisotropy in its SG response using atomic spins as the freezing degree of freedom. Recently we revisited this problem and showed, using neutron scattering, that the Fe spins develop nano-sized regions of antiferromagnetic (AF) order where the spins are either aligned or antialigned with the long direction, parallel to the a-axis [2]. These regions take the shape of surfboards with correlations lengths with the a-axis, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the lower panels of Fig. 1 we show the dimensionless χ ( T g ) vs. T g , using all available experimental data for families of compounds with variable disorder 5 , 9 , 18 – 30 (details on methodology are provided in the SI). We emphasise that, since different reviewed compounds have different microscopic sources of quenched disorder (to which impurity atoms contribute but of which they may not be the only source), the observed trends in the behaviour of χ ( T g ) vs. T g are universal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A naïve explanation for the hidden energy scale in GF systems is the presence of non-vacancy sources of quenched disorder, such as random strain in Y 2 Mo 2 O 7 , that could drive the glass transition in the zero-vacancy limit. However, the hidden energy scale has the same order of magnitude, , in all GF compounds (with the exception of Fe 3−3x Ga 3x−1 TiO 5 , in which and the transition is apparently dominated by clusters of ~30 Fe 3+ spins rather than by single-vacancy spins 30 ) Since the other compounds do not have significant known sources of disorder distinct from vacancies, this magnitude of the hidden energy scale requires an explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%