2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2013.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating target detection in presence of non Gaussian clutter in OFDM radars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the number of subcarrier increases, the dimension of measurement will grow rapidly and it would be difficult to compute. Hence we select a small number of subcarriers to evaluate our algorithm (in similar literatures, [10] sets N = 2, 4, 6 and [13] sets N = 1, 3, 5).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the number of subcarrier increases, the dimension of measurement will grow rapidly and it would be difficult to compute. Hence we select a small number of subcarriers to evaluate our algorithm (in similar literatures, [10] sets N = 2, 4, 6 and [13] sets N = 1, 3, 5).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of target detection in multipath scenarios is reformulated as sparse spectrum estimation and the spectral parameters of OFDM radar waveform are optimized based on multi-objective optimization (MOO) technique to improve the detection performance [11]. The performances of generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) detector with OFDM radar in non-Gaussian clutter (including Log-normal, Weibull and K-compound distribution) were investigated in [12,13] and target fluctuations were also taken into consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OFDM radar signals have several particular advantages [3][4][5], which are suitable for realization of the cognitive radar. There are two main reasons: 1) The design of OFDM signal is flexible, which is convenient for waveform adjustment of the cognitive radar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had been shown that multipath reflections affects categorized into two different aspects, namely, multipath suppression and multipath utilization. Some methods regard the multipath effect as a clutter component and try to suppress it [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Numerous methods, such as spatial smoothing techniques, proposed removing the coherency [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%