2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.022514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating surface currents: An algorithm for efficient prediction of Casimir interactions among arbitrary materials in arbitrary geometries

Abstract: This paper presents a new method for the efficient numerical computation of Casimir interactions between objects of arbitrary geometries, composed of materials with arbitrary frequency-dependent electrical properties. Our method formulates the Casimir effect as an interaction between effective electric and magnetic current distributions on the surfaces of material bodies, and obtains Casimir energies, forces, and torques from the spectral properties of a matrix that quantifies the interactions of these surface… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(201 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a represents the theoretical values of the Casimir force calculated for silicon structures of such geometry, with no fitting parameters. The theoretical calculation involves a boundary-element method (BEM) discretization of the beam and substrate surfaces, combined with a recent fluctuating-surfacecurrent formulation of the Casimir force between dielectric bodies that writes the full Casimir-energy path integral as a simple expression in the classical BEM interaction matrix 14,25 . It includes the contributions of the finite conductivity of silicon and the imperfect etching profiles on the sidewalls of the beam and the electrode (B88°from the substrate surface, see Supplementary Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3a represents the theoretical values of the Casimir force calculated for silicon structures of such geometry, with no fitting parameters. The theoretical calculation involves a boundary-element method (BEM) discretization of the beam and substrate surfaces, combined with a recent fluctuating-surfacecurrent formulation of the Casimir force between dielectric bodies that writes the full Casimir-energy path integral as a simple expression in the classical BEM interaction matrix 14,25 . It includes the contributions of the finite conductivity of silicon and the imperfect etching profiles on the sidewalls of the beam and the electrode (B88°from the substrate surface, see Supplementary Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a) neglects the finite length of the beams. The geometry reduces to a two-dimensional problem in the cross-sections (integrated over the longitudinal wavevector), and each object's surface is discretized into set of line segments described by 'rooftop' basis functions 25 . We found that a discretization of approximately 3,200 total points for all surfaces and a substrate truncated to 1 mm was sufficient to obtain convergence to 1% accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To rule out systematical errors from the space discretization and time integration in the FDTD simulations, we double-checked the reliability of our simulations by also numerically solving Maxwell's equations with the BEM as implemented in the public-domain SCUFF-EM package [48][49][50]. Being a frequency-domain method, the BEM is free from time integration errors that contribute to the errors in FDTD.…”
Section: Appendix B Fdtd: Obtaining the Field Enhancement Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual electronic response of each atom arises from the coupling of valence electronic and phononic excitations via shortrange interactions, represented schematically: for every atom p, a nuclear oscillator of mass mIp with dissipation bIp is connected to nuclear oscillators of other atoms q via anisotropic spring constants Kpq, and to an electronic oscillator of mass mep with dissipation bep and isotropic spring constant kep; only the electrons couple directly to long-range EM fields with effective charge qep. a composite susceptibility V env is given by [24,27,28],…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%