2001
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating asymmetry, mating success, body size and heterozygosity in Coenagrion scitulum (Rambur) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study joins an increasing body of recent research on the role of fluctuating asymmetry in odonates (e.g. Córdoba‐Aguilar, 1995; Bonn et al 1996; Leung and Forbes 1997; Jennions 1998; Carchini et al 2000, 2001) and other insects (Thornhill 1992; Thornhill and Sauer 1992; Hunt and Simmons 1997, 1998; David et al 1998). Clearly the relationship between fluctuating asymmetry, reproductive success, and fitness needs additional exploration in insects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This study joins an increasing body of recent research on the role of fluctuating asymmetry in odonates (e.g. Córdoba‐Aguilar, 1995; Bonn et al 1996; Leung and Forbes 1997; Jennions 1998; Carchini et al 2000, 2001) and other insects (Thornhill 1992; Thornhill and Sauer 1992; Hunt and Simmons 1997, 1998; David et al 1998). Clearly the relationship between fluctuating asymmetry, reproductive success, and fitness needs additional exploration in insects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The most common measure of DS is fluctuating asymmetry (FA), the nondirectional deviation from bilateral symmetry (Van Valen 1962). Several studies have found evidence for increasing FA with inbreeding, using individuals or populations varying in heterozygosity (Leary et al 1983(Leary et al , 1984Alibert et al 1994) or comparisons of inbred lines with their F 1 hybrids (Mather 1953;Beardmore 1960;Reeve 1960), whereas others have failed to find such a relationship (heterozygosity: Clarke et al 1992;Gilligan et al 2000;Carchini et al 2001;controlled inbreeding experiments: Fowler and Whitlock 1994;Sheridan and Pomiankowski 1997;Hosken et al 2000). This inconsistency in the results has raised doubts about the generality of FA as an index of DS and about the reliability of FA to detect inbreeding effects (see reviews in Palmer and Strobeck 1986;Møller and Swaddle 1997;Vøllestad et al 1999;Gilligan et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…in damselflies (Carchini et al. ). Strong evidence supporting linkage between heterozygosity and body size comes from the studies on shell length of bivalves, as positive associations between both traits were demonstrated for several species, such as eastern oyster ( Crassostrea virginica Gmelin, 1791) (Zouros et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%