2018
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flt-3L Expansion of Recipient CD8α+ Dendritic Cells Deletes Alloreactive Donor T Cells and Represents an Alternative to Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide for the Prevention of GVHD

Abstract: Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) provides curative therapy for leukemia via immunologic graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects. In practice, this must be balanced against life threatening pathology induced by graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Recipient dendritic cells (DC) are thought to be important in the induction of GVL and GVHD. We have utilized preclinical models of allogeneic BMT to dissect the role and modulation of recipient DCs in controlling donor T-cell-mediated GVHD and GVL. We demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next sought to determine the mechanism by which BEN+TBI conditioning promotes the prevalence of cDC1s independently of the Batf3 transcription factor. The DC subset composition observed with BEN+TBI conditioning, associated with increased cDC1s compared to other DC subsets, is consistent with enhanced Flt3 signaling following administration of exogenous Flt3 Ligand (Flt3L) (24,28). We therefore sought to measure circulating levels of Flt3L to test the hypothesis that BEN achieves greater proportions of cDC1s by enhancing Flt3L signaling.…”
Section: Ben Compared To Cy Treatment Results In Greater Expression Omentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We next sought to determine the mechanism by which BEN+TBI conditioning promotes the prevalence of cDC1s independently of the Batf3 transcription factor. The DC subset composition observed with BEN+TBI conditioning, associated with increased cDC1s compared to other DC subsets, is consistent with enhanced Flt3 signaling following administration of exogenous Flt3 Ligand (Flt3L) (24,28). We therefore sought to measure circulating levels of Flt3L to test the hypothesis that BEN achieves greater proportions of cDC1s by enhancing Flt3L signaling.…”
Section: Ben Compared To Cy Treatment Results In Greater Expression Omentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Batf3-dependent cDC1s have been linked to suppression of GvHD through activationinduced clonal deletion of allospecific donor T-cells (24) as well as superior GvL due to the specialized ability of these cells to capture, process and present tumor Ag to CD8+ T-cells (25)(26)(27). Studies using the administration of exogenous Flt3 Ligand (Flt3L) prior to transplantation have highlighted the role that host DCs, particularly host cDC1s, play in limiting GvHD (24,28). Additionally, on the various DC subsets, greater expression of the stimulatory markers CD80 and CD86 allows for stronger engagement of naïve T-cells (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the expansion of DCs by SDF-1α therapy is largely restricted to the DC1 subset and resulted in a decrease in GVHD severity ( 23 ). Host DC1 have been shown to protect against aGVHD ( 93 , 94 ). DC1 cells have an intrinsic ability to cross present antigens on MHC-I molecules and they are poor activators of CD4 + T cells ( 95 , 96 ), a property that is likely important for preventing unwanted T cell activation during homeostatic stimulation of naïve lymphocytes.…”
Section: Restoring the Peripheral Nichementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where only leukemia-derived antigen was present, DC were required for its cross-presentation and indeed, in the absence of DC there was no difference between OT-I accumulation when compared with the non-leukemia (i.e., no antigen) controls (red bars). This suggests that where a low-abundance, leukemia-specific antigen is present, reconstituted donor DC are critical for cross-presentation of this antigen to antigen-specific donor T cells, and can lead to a net stimulatory response rather than the deletion that occurs when recipient DC present highly abundant endogenous antigens [1].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to graft-versus-host (GVH) effects, it is increasingly clear that recipient-type cDC play a largely regulatory role rather than a stimulatory one (now demonstrated in both CD4 + and CD8 + T cell systems), and that non-hematopoietic antigen presentation contributes to the initiation of MHC class II-dependent GVHD [1][2][3][4]. Donor APC influence the severity of GVHD, but are inefficient at initiating disease in isolation, and make minimal contribution to GVL in systems that utilize various cell lines [5,6].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%