1996
DOI: 10.1093/nar/24.19.3784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FLP-mediated recombination of FRT sites in the maize genome

Abstract: Molecular evidence is provided for genomic recombinations in maize cells induced by the yeast FLP/FRT site-specific recombination system. The FLP protein recombined FRT sites previously integrated into the maize genome leading to excision of a selectable marker, the neo gene. NPTII activity was not observed after the successful recombination process; instead, the gusA gene was activated by the removal of the blocking DNA fragment. Genomic sequencing in the region of the FRT site (following the recombination re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been proposed to eliminate the selection marker from the primary transformant. These include use of a site-specific recombination system, such as Cre-lox or Flp-Frt (2,19,57,209,235,347,348) to remove the marker, transposon-based movement of the selection marker from the initial site of insertion from the plant genome entirely or to another unlinked site from which it can be segregated in subsequent generations (93), or the use of multiple T-DNAs which can insert into unlinked sites for future segregation (reviewed in references 142 and 372). Each of these systems has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Transfer Of Multiple T-dnas Into the Same Plant Cell And Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed to eliminate the selection marker from the primary transformant. These include use of a site-specific recombination system, such as Cre-lox or Flp-Frt (2,19,57,209,235,347,348) to remove the marker, transposon-based movement of the selection marker from the initial site of insertion from the plant genome entirely or to another unlinked site from which it can be segregated in subsequent generations (93), or the use of multiple T-DNAs which can insert into unlinked sites for future segregation (reviewed in references 142 and 372). Each of these systems has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Transfer Of Multiple T-dnas Into the Same Plant Cell And Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, marker genes can be efficiently removed by directly flanking the marker gene expression cassette with recombination sites, such as lox and FRT (Dale and Ow 1991;Lyznik et al 1996) as one method among other (Komari et al 1996) to make marker free transgenic crops. It has also been used for gene targeting to insert foreign genes precisely into a pre-existing site for more predictable expression of introduced genes than occurs with random integrations (Day et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is often referred to as auto-excision. In the first subcategory, the recombinase can be delivered to a transgenic plant by retransformation (Odell et al, 1990;Dale and Ow, 1991;Lyznik et al, 1996), by sexual crosses (Bayley et al, 1992;Russell et al, 1992;Kilby et al, 1995;Kerbach et al, 2005), or by transiently expressing the recombinase (Gleave et al, 1999;Kopertekh et al, 2004aKopertekh et al, , 2004bKopertekh and Schliemann, 2005;Jia et al, 2006). Recently, the company Renessen received U.S. regulatory approval (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ brs/aphisdocs2 /04_22901p_com.pdf) for the transgenic line LY038 from which the selectable marker, originally present between tandemly oriented lox sites, was removed through introduction of the cre gene by a sexual cross (Ow, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%