2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02944312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowshop simulator using different sampling methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is safe by reducing substantially the risk of sampling bias, efficient by producing estimates with lower variances and convenient by removing the need to determine in advance the sample size. The efficiency of RDS over DS and SRS is proved by several comparisons, for instance, on a flow shop system and a production system [16,17]. In [9], there is a discussion deducing that RDS outperforms DS, SRS, LHS and QMC methods and it is capable of substantially reducing the cost of running simulation experiments, if properly applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is safe by reducing substantially the risk of sampling bias, efficient by producing estimates with lower variances and convenient by removing the need to determine in advance the sample size. The efficiency of RDS over DS and SRS is proved by several comparisons, for instance, on a flow shop system and a production system [16,17]. In [9], there is a discussion deducing that RDS outperforms DS, SRS, LHS and QMC methods and it is capable of substantially reducing the cost of running simulation experiments, if properly applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%